Compare / Hy3 preview vs GLM 4.7 Flash
Hy3 preview vs GLM 4.7 Flash
Which is cheaper, which is more capable, and which does better at each kind of work, from 17 results on 3 sources that measured both models.
Hy3 preview or GLM 4.7 Flash? The short answer
- GLM 4.7 Flash is cheaper: $0.15 against $0.29 per million tokens, 49% less.
- Hy3 preview scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index: 22.7 against 14.9.
- On our business benchmarks, Hy3 preview ranks higher for reasoning and knowledge and writing.
- On our business benchmarks, GLM 4.7 Flash ranks higher for sticking to the facts.
At a glance
| Hy3 preview | GLM 4.7 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Price per million tokens | $0.18 in · $0.60 out | $0.060 in · $0.40 out |
| Blended (3 in : 1 out) | $0.29 | $0.15 |
| Cheapest host, blended | – | $0.15 (Venice, FP8) |
| Intelligence Index | 22.7 | 14.9 |
| Spring Prompt overall | – | – |
| Output speed, tokens a second | – | – |
| Context window | 262,144 tokens | 200,000 tokens |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Developer based in | China | China |
Prices are the developer's list price where we have read it, otherwise the typical host on OpenRouter; see every model's price. Intelligence and speed from Artificial Analysis.
Which is better for what
Each model's rank among models available today, for each kind of work, from our own benchmarks and licensed sources. The better rank is in green.
| Use case | Hy3 preview | GLM 4.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Reasoning and knowledgeHard questions across science, maths and general knowledge | 73 of 195 | 139 of 195 |
| WritingWhat people prefer in blind comparisons, and judged writing quality | 86 of 187 | 148 of 187 |
| Sticking to the factsSummarising without inventing things, and factual answers | 128 of 153 | 109 of 153 |
| Speed under pressureGood decisions against a real clock (fast chess) | not measured | 22 of 22 |
Every shared result
| Benchmark | Metric | Hy3 preview | GLM 4.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | OverallArena rating | 1,413 | 1,370 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Business, management and financeArena rating | 1,411 | 1,368 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Creative writingArena rating | 1,354 | 1,306 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Expert promptsArena rating | 1,446 | 1,386 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Instruction followingArena rating | 1,397 | 1,348 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | OverallArena rating | 1,409 | 1,365 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Writing, literature and languageArena rating | 1,378 | 1,331 |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Artificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score | 22.7 | 14.9 |
| Artificial Analysisreported | GPQA Diamond% of questions | 86.7% | 58.1% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Humanity's Last Exam% of questions | 27.8% | 7.6% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | IFBench% of instructions | 63.1% | 60.8% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Long-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions | 64.7% | 41.7% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Terminal-Bench Hard% of tasks | 34.1% | 22.0% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Τ²-bench telecom% of tasks | 92.7% | 98.8% |
| UGI Leaderboardreported | Requested-length error% off the requested word count | 18.0% | 39.0% |
| UGI Leaderboardreported | Style adherencescore from 0 to 1 | 0.34 | 0.37 |
| UGI Leaderboardreported | Writing scorescore out of 100 | 51.1 | 25.0 |
Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.
Quick answers
Is Hy3 preview better than GLM 4.7 Flash?
It depends on the task. Among models available today, on our benchmarks and licensed sources, Hy3 preview ranks higher for reasoning and knowledge and writing; GLM 4.7 Flash ranks higher for sticking to the facts.
Which is cheaper, Hy3 preview or GLM 4.7 Flash?
GLM 4.7 Flash costs $0.15 per million tokens (three input to one output), against $0.29 for Hy3 preview.
Run Hy3 preview and GLM 4.7 Flash on your own prompt
Benchmarks aren't your data. Try both side by side in the playground, with the cost of every answer.