Experiments / Experiment 06

Experiment 06 · Tested 4 November 2026

Which model should answer your phones?

On a phone call, a long answer is a bad answer. We tested seven models as a clinic receptionist. The first prompt nearly always ran too long, and one rewrite fixed most of that.

Best value
$0.48
per 1,000 answers: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, medium thinking, 36 of 36 in 1.7 s
Claude Opus 5.5
0 → 36
of 36 passed, first prompt to one rewrite, low thinking

A test case, not a customer. We built this on invented data and ran it on 4 November 2026. Models and prices change, and we don't rerun these often, so check the date.

What we tested

  1. 2prompts: a plain first one, and one rewrite
  2. 24test cases, 18 kept unseen for scoring
  3. 7models, each at two thinking settings
  4. 7checks on every answer
  5. 756answers scored, on 4 November 2026
First prompt 203 characters
You are the phone receptionist for a dental clinic. Help the caller. Open slots: Tue 9:30, Tue 14:00, Thu 11:15. New patient check-up costs £60. Say your reply as you would on a call.

Caller: {{caller}}
After one rewrite 1402 characters
You are the phone receptionist for a dental clinic. Help the caller. Open slots: Tue 9:30, Tue 14:00, Thu 11:15. New patient check-up costs £60. Say your reply as you would on a call.

Keep every reply to at most 40 words. Use natural spoken sentences, with no lists, asterisks or hash signs. Ask at most one question, requesting only one thing.

First briefly confirm the caller's relevant detail before moving on. If they only greet you, greet them back without inventing details.

For routine appointment or price enquiries, offer just one listed slot, matching their preference where possible. State £60 when discussing a new patient check-up. Never invent fees, services, opening hours, waiting lists or alternative availability. Keep each slot attached to its listed weekday; do not call it today or tomorrow. If their requested time is unavailable, acknowledge that, offer one listed slot without reading out alternatives, and ask whether another day could work. Do not claim an appointment is booked or changed before confirmation.

For urgent symptoms or injuries, prioritise passing the caller to a person: briefly repeat the key details and say you will pass them to a member of the dental team now. Give no medical advice, self-care instructions or treatment recommendations. Do not offer routine slots, promise immediate treatment or add a price to this urgent handoff.

Caller: {{caller}}

Who won

Best valueDeepSeek V4.1 Flash, medium thinking

36 of 36 at $0.48 per 1,000 answers, in 1.7 s.

FastestDeepSeek V4.1 Flash, thinking off

31 of 36 in 0.7 s at $0.06. Mercury off matched that score in 0.8 s.

Also perfectClaude Opus 5.5, low thinking

36 of 36, but at $6.66 and 4.3 s.

Passes against cost, after the rewriteOff or low thinking Medium thinking
09182736 $0.01$0.10$1$10 Cost per 1,000 answers (log scale) Passed, of 36 Better ↖ DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, medium thinking: 36 of 36, $0.48, 1.7 sDeepSeek, medium: best valueGPT-6.1 Sol, medium thinking: 36 of 36, $1.65, 4.3 sGemini 3.8 Flash, medium thinking: 36 of 36, $3.58, 7.3 sClaude Opus 5.5, low thinking: 36 of 36, $6.66, 4.3 sOpus, lowClaude Opus 5.5, medium thinking: 36 of 36, $9.68, 6.0 sClaude Haiku 5.5, medium thinking: 35 of 36, $0.30, 4.4 sGemini 3.8 Flash, low thinking: 35 of 36, $0.96, 2.7 sMercury 3, medium thinking: 33 of 36, $0.18, 1.5 sGPT-6.1 Sol, low thinking: 33 of 36, $1.18, 3.4 sMercury 3, off thinking: 31 of 36, $0.04, 0.8 sDeepSeek V4.1 Flash, off thinking: 31 of 36, $0.06, 0.7 sDeepSeek, off: fastestNex N2.5 Mini, medium thinking: 22 of 36, $0.05, 2.1 sNex N2.5 Mini, off thinking: 21 of 36, $0.01, 0.7 sClaude Haiku 5.5, off thinking: 18 of 36, $0.09, 1.9 s

Hover over a point for the model and setting. Every run is in the table below.

All 14 runs
ModelThinkingFirst promptAfter one rewriteCost per 1,000 answersMedian timeThinking tokens
DeepSeek V4.1 FlashMediumnot run36 of 36$0.481.7 s352
GPT-6.1 SolMediumnot run36 of 36$1.654.3 s59
Gemini 3.8 FlashMediumnot run36 of 36$3.587.3 s846
Claude Opus 5.5Low036 of 36$6.664.3 s169
Claude Opus 5.5Mediumnot run36 of 36$9.686.0 s320
Claude Haiku 5.5Mediumnot run35 of 36$0.304.4 s444
Gemini 3.8 FlashLow535 of 36$0.962.7 s147
Mercury 3Mediumnot run33 of 36$0.181.5 s408
GPT-6.1 SolLow1533 of 36$1.183.4 s11
Mercury 3Off231 of 36$0.040.8 s0
DeepSeek V4.1 FlashOff331 of 36$0.060.7 s0
Nex N2.5 MiniMediumnot run22 of 36$0.052.1 s418
Nex N2.5 MiniOff821 of 36$0.010.7 s0
Claude Haiku 5.5Off118 of 36$0.091.9 s0

Sorted by passes, then cost. First prompt was run at the lowest setting only. Thinking tokens are per answer, as each provider reports them. Cost is the model's price for the answer, per 1,000 answers, on the test date. A code fence around JSON counts as valid, but anything that doesn't parse is a fail.

What went wrong, and what the rewrite fixed

The share of answers that passed each check, across all seven models with thinking at its lowest setting.

First prompt After one rewrite

At most 40 words 17%89%
Confirms the detail back before moving on nice to have 72%84%
Asks at most one question 73%98%
Offers only the open slots and states only the listed price 83%91%
Never says “*” or “#” 88%99%
Gives no medical advice, and passes urgent symptoms to a person 88%97%
Sounds natural spoken aloud, with no lists 93%97%

Real answers from the test

What changed in the prompt

  1. Write for the ear

    Set a hard word limit and ban lists and markdown. Opus used asterisks in a spoken reply.

  2. One question at a time

    Callers can't answer two at once. The first prompt often asked for several details together.

  3. Only offer what's listed

    Models worked out prices and totals nobody gave them. Tell the agent to say it can't confirm instead.

  4. Time matters as much as score

    Median time here is for text only. A real call adds speech recognition and voice on top.

Does more thinking help?

For the smaller models thinking changed the result: Haiku went from 18 of 36 with thinking off to 35 on medium, and DeepSeek from 31 to 36 for about a second more. Opus was already perfect on low. Gemini on medium added 1 pass for nearly 4 times the cost, and 7.3 s is too slow for a call.

How we tested it

  • We wrote a plain first prompt, the kind you'd write on day one, and three awkward cases by hand. A model drafted the rest, for 24 cases in all.
  • The prompt ran on 6 of those cases. GPT-6.1 Sol rewrote it once from what failed, which is what Spring Prompt's assistant does.
  • Both prompts then ran on the 18 cases the rewrite never saw, twice, so scores are out of 36. An answer passes only if it meets every must check.
  • We set thinking on purpose. Lowest means off where a model allows it, and low where it doesn't. We also ran the rewrite at medium.
  • GPT-6 Luna judged each answer with three votes. Word limits and JSON were checked by code, and we read a sample of answers by hand.

What this can't tell you

  • The cases are invented, so a real product will behave differently. Your prompt, data and customers matter more than this table.
  • 18 cases is small. Gaps of two or three cases can be chance, so read the top few as level.
  • A model drafted most cases and a model judged them.
  • Costs are model prices for the answers alone, and they change often. Times come from one day's runs.
  • This tests text replies. We didn't test speech recognition, voices or interruptions, which matter just as much on a real call.
Invite only

Run this on your own prompt.

Paste a prompt, and Spring Prompt drafts the test cases and checks. You'll see which model passes, what it costs and how fast it is. We're opening it up by invitation, with test credits to start.

Request an invite Takes a minute. We reply by email.