Confirm Action

Are you sure you want to proceed?

Is claude-opus-4.5-medium good at Frontend & Landing Pages?

claude-opus-4.5-medium ranks #2 of 93 for Frontend & Landing Pages — usable. The top pick for this task is gemini-3-flash-preview-max.

#2 / 93
Rank for this task
72.3
Score
$0.2514
Cost / run

claude-opus-4.5-medium on each Frontend & Landing Pages sub-task

Pricing Page Build 73.0/100 #8
Landing Page Build 72.0/100 #5

Real examples, graded

WinLumen Health — compliance-careful healthtech 76/100

“Copy is highly specific, benefit-led, and strictly adheres to compliance constraints without hype. Desktop design is clean and professional. However, the mobile layout is fundamentally broken with severe horizontal overflow across all sections.”

← Full claude-opus-4.5-medium review All Frontend & Landing Pages rankings → Top pick: gemini-3-flash-preview-max →

Frequently asked

Is claude-opus-4.5-medium good at Frontend & Landing Pages?

claude-opus-4.5-medium ranks #2 of 93 models we tested for Frontend & Landing Pages, scoring usable.

What is claude-opus-4.5-medium's strongest Frontend & Landing Pages skill?

Its best sub-task here is Pricing Page Build.

This page is Spring Prompt, running

We just did this for every model. Do it for your prompt.

The rankings above come from running real tasks through real models and scoring every output. Spring Prompt is that same engine — pointed at your prompt, your test cases, and your definition of good.

  • Generate test cases from your prompt — no eval set required to start.
  • Compare models side by side with quality, cost and latency in one matrix.
  • Optimise the winner until the scores say it's ready to ship.
Experiment · Cold outreach email

Prompt × model results

12 test cases · 3 evals
Claude Opus
GPT-5
Gemini
v1
7.1
6.8
7.4
v2
8.3
7.9
8.0
v3
9.2
8.6
8.4
Best combo: v3 × Claude Opus
9.2 quality · $0.004/run · 1.8s