Is claude-opus-4.5-max good at Legal & HR?
claude-opus-4.5-max ranks #19 of 69 for Legal & HR — excellent. The top pick for this task is claude-sonnet-4.6-high.
#19 / 69
Rank for this task
93.7
Score
$0.0466
Cost / run
claude-opus-4.5-max on each Legal & HR sub-task
| Performance Feedback | 100.0/100 | #16 |
| Structured Interview Kit | 99.0/100 | #32 |
| Contract Clause Review | 94.3/100 | #39 |
| Job Description | 90.7/100 | #49 |
| Plain-English Explainer | 84.3/100 | #14 |
Real examples, graded
WeakCafé manager (Glow & Grain, non-tech) 48/100
“The model successfully captured the warm tone but fabricated specific company details and missed key compliance and structural requirements.”
Frequently asked
Is claude-opus-4.5-max good at Legal & HR?
claude-opus-4.5-max ranks #19 of 69 models we tested for Legal & HR, scoring excellent.
What is claude-opus-4.5-max's strongest Legal & HR skill?
Its best sub-task here is Performance Feedback.
This page is Spring Prompt, running
We just did this for every model. Do it for your prompt.
The rankings above come from running real tasks through real models and scoring every output. Spring Prompt is that same engine — pointed at your prompt, your test cases, and your definition of good.
- Generate test cases from your prompt — no eval set required to start.
- Compare models side by side with quality, cost and latency in one matrix.
- Optimise the winner until the scores say it's ready to ship.
Experiment · Cold outreach email
Prompt × model results
12 test cases · 3 evalsClaude Opus
GPT-5
Gemini
v1
7.1
6.8
7.4
v2
8.3
7.9
8.0
v3
9.2
★
8.6
8.4
Best combo: v3 × Claude Opus
9.2 quality · $0.004/run · 1.8s