Is Claude Opus 4.5 good at Summarization & Meeting Notes?
Claude Opus 4.5 ranks #1 of 44 for Summarization & Meeting Notes — excellent.
#1 / 44
Rank for this task
99.9
Score
$0.0204
Cost / run
Claude Opus 4.5 on each Summarization & Meeting Notes sub-task
| Action-Item Extraction | 100.0/100 | #7 |
| Faithfulness Under Pressure | 100.0/100 | #32 |
| Transcript Q&A | 100.0/100 | #32 |
| Messy Transcript | 100.0/100 | #15 |
| Executive Summary | 99.5/100 | #2 |
Frequently asked
Is Claude Opus 4.5 good at Summarization & Meeting Notes?
Claude Opus 4.5 ranks #1 of 44 models we tested for Summarization & Meeting Notes, scoring excellent.
What is Claude Opus 4.5's strongest Summarization & Meeting Notes skill?
Its best sub-task here is Action-Item Extraction.
This page is Spring Prompt, running
We just did this for every model. Do it for your prompt.
The rankings above come from running real tasks through real models and scoring every output. Spring Prompt is that same engine — pointed at your prompt, your test cases, and your definition of good.
- Generate test cases from your prompt — no eval set required to start.
- Compare models side by side with quality, cost and latency in one matrix.
- Optimise the winner until the scores say it's ready to ship.
Experiment · Cold outreach email
Prompt × model results
12 test cases · 3 evalsClaude Opus
GPT-5
Gemini
v1
7.1
6.8
7.4
v2
8.3
7.9
8.0
v3
9.2
★
8.6
8.4
Best combo: v3 × Claude Opus
9.2 quality · $0.004/run · 1.8s