Confirm Action

Are you sure you want to proceed?

Is claude-opus-4.6-low good at Sales?

claude-opus-4.6-low ranks #1 of 44 for Sales — strong.

#1 / 44
Rank for this task
84.6
Score
$0.0506
Cost / run

claude-opus-4.6-low on each Sales sub-task

Follow-up & Break-up 89.0/100 #8
Cold Outbound Email 88.2/100 #8
Discovery Call Prep 82.0/100 #1
Objection Handling 79.5/100 #12

Real examples, graded

WinBroker discovery with a value hypothesis 89/100

“The response is expert-level and production-ready. It perfectly adopts the logistics-native brand voice, uses the verified facts effectively, and structures the call around a highly credible value hypothesis and excellent open, implication-focused questions. It is difficult to improve.”

← Full claude-opus-4.6-low review All Sales rankings →

Frequently asked

Is claude-opus-4.6-low good at Sales?

claude-opus-4.6-low ranks #1 of 44 models we tested for Sales, scoring strong.

What is claude-opus-4.6-low's strongest Sales skill?

Its best sub-task here is Follow-up & Break-up.

This page is Spring Prompt, running

We just did this for every model. Do it for your prompt.

The rankings above come from running real tasks through real models and scoring every output. Spring Prompt is that same engine — pointed at your prompt, your test cases, and your definition of good.

  • Generate test cases from your prompt — no eval set required to start.
  • Compare models side by side with quality, cost and latency in one matrix.
  • Optimise the winner until the scores say it's ready to ship.
Experiment · Cold outreach email

Prompt × model results

12 test cases · 3 evals
Claude Opus
GPT-5
Gemini
v1
7.1
6.8
7.4
v2
8.3
7.9
8.0
v3
9.2
8.6
8.4
Best combo: v3 × Claude Opus
9.2 quality · $0.004/run · 1.8s