Confirm Action

Are you sure you want to proceed?

Is claude-opus-4.8-low good at Presentations & Decks?

claude-opus-4.8-low ranks #13 of 44 for Presentations & Decks — excellent. The top pick for this task is gpt-5.4-high.

#13 / 44
Rank for this task
91.2
Score
$0.0336
Cost / run

claude-opus-4.8-low on each Presentations & Decks sub-task

Deck Storyline 99.3/100 #17
Action Titles 96.7/100 #6
Executive Recommendation 91.0/100 #21
Honest Data Slide 78.0/100 #27

Real examples, graded

WeakRight chart for a comparison (Cedar & Sage) 38/100

“While the model correctly recommends a horizontal bar chart, advises against chartjunk, and specifies a zero-based axis, it completely fails the honest data requirement. The suggested takeaway titles are mathematically incorrect and overstate the data. Furthermore, the response relies on topic labels for its own structure.”

← Full claude-opus-4.8-low review All Presentations & Decks rankings → Top pick: gpt-5.4-high →

Frequently asked

Is claude-opus-4.8-low good at Presentations & Decks?

claude-opus-4.8-low ranks #13 of 44 models we tested for Presentations & Decks, scoring excellent.

What is claude-opus-4.8-low's strongest Presentations & Decks skill?

Its best sub-task here is Deck Storyline.

This page is Spring Prompt, running

We just did this for every model. Do it for your prompt.

The rankings above come from running real tasks through real models and scoring every output. Spring Prompt is that same engine — pointed at your prompt, your test cases, and your definition of good.

  • Generate test cases from your prompt — no eval set required to start.
  • Compare models side by side with quality, cost and latency in one matrix.
  • Optimise the winner until the scores say it's ready to ship.
Experiment · Cold outreach email

Prompt × model results

12 test cases · 3 evals
Claude Opus
GPT-5
Gemini
v1
7.1
6.8
7.4
v2
8.3
7.9
8.0
v3
9.2
8.6
8.4
Best combo: v3 × Claude Opus
9.2 quality · $0.004/run · 1.8s