Is claude-opus-4.8-high good at Summarization & Meeting Notes?
claude-opus-4.8-high ranks #20 of 44 for Summarization & Meeting Notes — excellent. The top pick for this task is claude-opus-4.5.
claude-opus-4.8-high on each Summarization & Meeting Notes sub-task
| Faithfulness Under Pressure | 100.0/100 | #5 |
| Transcript Q&A | 100.0/100 | #2 |
| Action-Item Extraction | 99.2/100 | #11 |
| Executive Summary | 92.0/100 | #26 |
| Messy Transcript | 87.0/100 | #35 |
Real examples, graded
WeakFerrovia Q2 business review 5/100
“The model hallucinated an action item owner by assigning Frank to produce the storage-cost model instead of just reviewing it.”
WeakTradewinds — unresolved policy + parked idea 50/100
“The summary correctly captures the parked items and the apology call, but it invents an action item for Carmen to document the existing no-show policy. While the transcript notes the policy is unwritten, no one commits to documenting it. Explicitly inventing next steps (even if labeled 'implied') is a major faithfulness failure.”
Frequently asked
Is claude-opus-4.8-high good at Summarization & Meeting Notes?
claude-opus-4.8-high ranks #20 of 44 models we tested for Summarization & Meeting Notes, scoring excellent.
What is claude-opus-4.8-high's strongest Summarization & Meeting Notes skill?
Its best sub-task here is Faithfulness Under Pressure.
This page is Spring Prompt, running
We just did this for every model. Do it for your prompt.
The rankings above come from running real tasks through real models and scoring every output. Spring Prompt is that same engine — pointed at your prompt, your test cases, and your definition of good.
- Generate test cases from your prompt — no eval set required to start.
- Compare models side by side with quality, cost and latency in one matrix.
- Optimise the winner until the scores say it's ready to ship.
Prompt × model results
12 test cases · 3 evals