Confirm Action

Are you sure you want to proceed?

Is claude-sonnet-5-high good at Coding?

claude-sonnet-5-high ranks #1 of 55 for Coding — excellent.

#1 / 55
Rank for this task
93.3
Score
$0.0414
Cost / run

claude-sonnet-5-high on each Coding sub-task

Refactoring 100.0/100 #1
Code Review & Security 100.0/100 #1
Bug Fixing 99.6/100 #3
Secure Implementation 98.0/100 #19
Code Quality and Testing Test 92.2/100 #3
Code Review and Risk Test 85.0/100 #1
API and Data Code Test 71.4/100 #17

Real examples, graded

WinOff-by-one in a slice helper 100/100

“The model perfectly diagnoses the root cause, provides the minimal fix, and excellently handles the edge cases (n=0, n>len) in a bonus section, demonstrating a deep understanding of Python's slicing mechanics.”

WinFix off-by-one Python bug 100/100

“The model provides a perfectly correct and robust fix for the off-by-one error. It handles all edge cases (n=0, negative n, n > length) without changing the public API. The explanation is clear, and the unit tests are comprehensive.”

WinJavaScript debounce implementation 100/100

“The provided solution is an excellent, robust implementation of a debounce function in JavaScript. It correctly manages the timer, preserves the `this` context and arguments of the latest call, and includes both `cancel` and `flush` functionalities. It also properly clears references to avoid memory leaks. The explanation and tests are clear, accurate, and directly address the requirements.”

WeakOff-by-one in a slice helper 100/100

“The model perfectly diagnoses the root cause and provides a minimal fix. Furthermore, it correctly identifies a subtle edge case with `n=0` when using negative indexing and provides an idiomatic solution that handles it flawlessly.”

WeakFix off-by-one Python bug 98/100

“The model successfully invents a plausible scenario (since none was provided), correctly diagnoses the off-by-one root cause in Python slicing, and provides a working fix with tests and explanations.”

WeakJavaScript debounce implementation 98/100

“The implementation is correct, handles edge cases (like preserving 'this' and arguments), and correctly implements the requested cancel functionality. It includes slight scope creep by adding 'flush' and 'immediate' execution, but these are standard features of a robust debounce function (e.g., Lodash) and do not detract from the quality of the answer.”

← Full claude-sonnet-5-high review All Coding rankings →

Frequently asked

Is claude-sonnet-5-high good at Coding?

claude-sonnet-5-high ranks #1 of 55 models we tested for Coding, scoring excellent.

What is claude-sonnet-5-high's strongest Coding skill?

Its best sub-task here is Refactoring.

This page is Spring Prompt, running

We just did this for every model. Do it for your prompt.

The rankings above come from running real tasks through real models and scoring every output. Spring Prompt is that same engine — pointed at your prompt, your test cases, and your definition of good.

  • Generate test cases from your prompt — no eval set required to start.
  • Compare models side by side with quality, cost and latency in one matrix.
  • Optimise the winner until the scores say it's ready to ship.
Experiment · Cold outreach email

Prompt × model results

12 test cases · 3 evals
Claude Opus
GPT-5
Gemini
v1
7.1
6.8
7.4
v2
8.3
7.9
8.0
v3
9.2
8.6
8.4
Best combo: v3 × Claude Opus
9.2 quality · $0.004/run · 1.8s