Confirm Action

Are you sure you want to proceed?

Is Deepseek v3.1 Terminus good at Presentations & Decks?

Deepseek v3.1 Terminus ranks #36 of 44 for Presentations & Decks — strong. The top pick for this task is gpt-5.4-high.

#36 / 44
Rank for this task
84.6
Score
$0.0225
Cost / run

Deepseek v3.1 Terminus on each Presentations & Decks sub-task

Deck Storyline 94.7/100 #35
Executive Recommendation 92.7/100 #19
Action Titles 89.0/100 #32
Honest Data Slide 62.0/100 #40

Real examples, graded

WeakBoard deck: pricing reversal (Ferrovia) 88/100

“The model successfully leads with the recommendation and provides full-sentence action titles that tell a coherent, answer-first story. The arguments are slightly repetitive to stretch to the requested 6-8 slide constraint, but they remain logical and are supported by clear, concise evidence. It ends with a strong executive ask.”

← Full Deepseek v3.1 Terminus review All Presentations & Decks rankings → Top pick: gpt-5.4-high →

Frequently asked

Is Deepseek v3.1 Terminus good at Presentations & Decks?

Deepseek v3.1 Terminus ranks #36 of 44 models we tested for Presentations & Decks, scoring strong.

What is Deepseek v3.1 Terminus's strongest Presentations & Decks skill?

Its best sub-task here is Deck Storyline.

This page is Spring Prompt, running

We just did this for every model. Do it for your prompt.

The rankings above come from running real tasks through real models and scoring every output. Spring Prompt is that same engine — pointed at your prompt, your test cases, and your definition of good.

  • Generate test cases from your prompt — no eval set required to start.
  • Compare models side by side with quality, cost and latency in one matrix.
  • Optimise the winner until the scores say it's ready to ship.
Experiment · Cold outreach email

Prompt × model results

12 test cases · 3 evals
Claude Opus
GPT-5
Gemini
v1
7.1
6.8
7.4
v2
8.3
7.9
8.0
v3
9.2
8.6
8.4
Best combo: v3 × Claude Opus
9.2 quality · $0.004/run · 1.8s