Confirm Action

Are you sure you want to proceed?

Is Deepseek v3.1 Terminus good at Product & Project Management?

Deepseek v3.1 Terminus ranks #33 of 44 for Product & Project Management — strong. The top pick for this task is claude-opus-4.8-high.

#33 / 44
Rank for this task
83.8
Score
$0.0238
Cost / run

Deepseek v3.1 Terminus on each Product & Project Management sub-task

User Stories & Acceptance Criteria 93.3/100 #31
PRD / Spec 91.0/100 #11
Roadmap 79.5/100 #43
Prioritization Rationale 63.0/100 #40
← Full Deepseek v3.1 Terminus review All Product & Project Management rankings → Top pick: claude-opus-4.8-high →

Frequently asked

Is Deepseek v3.1 Terminus good at Product & Project Management?

Deepseek v3.1 Terminus ranks #33 of 44 models we tested for Product & Project Management, scoring strong.

What is Deepseek v3.1 Terminus's strongest Product & Project Management skill?

Its best sub-task here is User Stories & Acceptance Criteria.

This page is Spring Prompt, running

We just did this for every model. Do it for your prompt.

The rankings above come from running real tasks through real models and scoring every output. Spring Prompt is that same engine — pointed at your prompt, your test cases, and your definition of good.

  • Generate test cases from your prompt — no eval set required to start.
  • Compare models side by side with quality, cost and latency in one matrix.
  • Optimise the winner until the scores say it's ready to ship.
Experiment · Cold outreach email

Prompt × model results

12 test cases · 3 evals
Claude Opus
GPT-5
Gemini
v1
7.1
6.8
7.4
v2
8.3
7.9
8.0
v3
9.2
8.6
8.4
Best combo: v3 × Claude Opus
9.2 quality · $0.004/run · 1.8s