Is Deepseek v3.2 good at Chef / Home Cooking?
Deepseek v3.2 ranks #30 of 50 for Chef / Home Cooking — usable. The top pick for this task is gemini-3.1-pro-preview-high.
#30 / 50
Rank for this task
72.5
Score
$0.0160
Cost / run
Deepseek v3.2 on each Chef / Home Cooking sub-task
| Practical Recipe Test | 81.3/100 | #23 |
| Substitution Test | 78.7/100 | #43 |
| Dinner Rescue Test | 69.3/100 | #45 |
| Meal Timing Test | 60.7/100 | #17 |
Real examples, graded
WeakLow-carb/high-carb shared dinner 20/100
“The response fails to properly execute the shared cooking base constraint, includes contradictory instructions regarding the chicken, and suggests poor culinary techniques.”
Frequently asked
Is Deepseek v3.2 good at Chef / Home Cooking?
Deepseek v3.2 ranks #30 of 50 models we tested for Chef / Home Cooking, scoring usable.
What is Deepseek v3.2's strongest Chef / Home Cooking skill?
Its best sub-task here is Practical Recipe Test.
This page is Spring Prompt, running
We just did this for every model. Do it for your prompt.
The rankings above come from running real tasks through real models and scoring every output. Spring Prompt is that same engine — pointed at your prompt, your test cases, and your definition of good.
- Generate test cases from your prompt — no eval set required to start.
- Compare models side by side with quality, cost and latency in one matrix.
- Optimise the winner until the scores say it's ready to ship.
Experiment · Cold outreach email
Prompt × model results
12 test cases · 3 evalsClaude Opus
GPT-5
Gemini
v1
7.1
6.8
7.4
v2
8.3
7.9
8.0
v3
9.2
★
8.6
8.4
Best combo: v3 × Claude Opus
9.2 quality · $0.004/run · 1.8s