Confirm Action

Are you sure you want to proceed?

Is Deepseek v3.2 good at Investor & Pitch?

Deepseek v3.2 ranks #28 of 50 for Investor & Pitch — usable. The top pick for this task is claude-sonnet-4.6-high.

#28 / 50
Rank for this task
78.1
Score
$0.0148
Cost / run

Deepseek v3.2 on each Investor & Pitch sub-task

Investor Question Test 81.7/100 #22
Founder Reality Check 80.7/100 #43
Market Sizing Reality Check 79.3/100 #33
Deck Doctor 70.7/100 #35

Real examples, graded

WeakWeak problem slide 46/100

“The model followed formatting constraints and provided a strong narrative, but it explicitly violated the failure mode by inventing specific statistics ($23B market size, 15-20% revenue loss) not present in the brief.”

← Full Deepseek v3.2 review All Investor & Pitch rankings → Top pick: claude-sonnet-4.6-high →

Frequently asked

Is Deepseek v3.2 good at Investor & Pitch?

Deepseek v3.2 ranks #28 of 50 models we tested for Investor & Pitch, scoring usable.

What is Deepseek v3.2's strongest Investor & Pitch skill?

Its best sub-task here is Investor Question Test.

This page is Spring Prompt, running

We just did this for every model. Do it for your prompt.

The rankings above come from running real tasks through real models and scoring every output. Spring Prompt is that same engine — pointed at your prompt, your test cases, and your definition of good.

  • Generate test cases from your prompt — no eval set required to start.
  • Compare models side by side with quality, cost and latency in one matrix.
  • Optimise the winner until the scores say it's ready to ship.
Experiment · Cold outreach email

Prompt × model results

12 test cases · 3 evals
Claude Opus
GPT-5
Gemini
v1
7.1
6.8
7.4
v2
8.3
7.9
8.0
v3
9.2
8.6
8.4
Best combo: v3 × Claude Opus
9.2 quality · $0.004/run · 1.8s