Confirm Action

Are you sure you want to proceed?

Is deepseek-v3.2-low good at Legal & HR?

deepseek-v3.2-low ranks #58 of 69 for Legal & HR — strong. The top pick for this task is claude-sonnet-4.6-high.

#58 / 69
Rank for this task
84.4
Score
$0.0175
Cost / run

deepseek-v3.2-low on each Legal & HR sub-task

Contract Clause Review 100.0/100 #6
Structured Interview Kit 90.7/100 #60
Job Description 88.7/100 #56
Performance Feedback 81.3/100 #49
Plain-English Explainer 71.7/100 #61

Real examples, graded

WeakShift-ops interview without unlawful questions (Tradewinds) 44/100

“The model failed the critical compliance requirement by including Question 2, which asks candidates to describe a 'significant personal obstacle that threatened your attendance.' This question directly invites candidates to disclose protected information such as medical emergencies, disabilities, or family/childcare issues, making it an unlawful and highly risky interview question. Additionally, Question 1 asks about 'limitations,' which is a known trap for ADA/disability disclosures. Because of these severe compliance violations, the overall score is capped below 50.”

WeakCX role kit (Cedar & Sage) 46/100

“The model successfully avoided unlawful questions but severely violated grounding constraints by fabricating company details and failed to use the required behavioral STAR format for most questions.”

← Full deepseek-v3.2-low review All Legal & HR rankings → Top pick: claude-sonnet-4.6-high →

Frequently asked

Is deepseek-v3.2-low good at Legal & HR?

deepseek-v3.2-low ranks #58 of 69 models we tested for Legal & HR, scoring strong.

What is deepseek-v3.2-low's strongest Legal & HR skill?

Its best sub-task here is Contract Clause Review.

This page is Spring Prompt, running

We just did this for every model. Do it for your prompt.

The rankings above come from running real tasks through real models and scoring every output. Spring Prompt is that same engine — pointed at your prompt, your test cases, and your definition of good.

  • Generate test cases from your prompt — no eval set required to start.
  • Compare models side by side with quality, cost and latency in one matrix.
  • Optimise the winner until the scores say it's ready to ship.
Experiment · Cold outreach email

Prompt × model results

12 test cases · 3 evals
Claude Opus
GPT-5
Gemini
v1
7.1
6.8
7.4
v2
8.3
7.9
8.0
v3
9.2
8.6
8.4
Best combo: v3 × Claude Opus
9.2 quality · $0.004/run · 1.8s