Is deepseek-v3.2-low good at Research & Competitive Analysis?
deepseek-v3.2-low ranks #21 of 44 for Research & Competitive Analysis — usable. The top pick for this task is claude-opus-4.8-low.
#21 / 44
Rank for this task
73.1
Score
$0.0161
Cost / run
deepseek-v3.2-low on each Research & Competitive Analysis sub-task
| Grounded Synthesis | 100.0/100 | #6 |
| SWOT & Strategy | 95.0/100 | #22 |
| Market Sizing | 73.5/100 | #15 |
| Competitive Teardown | 24.0/100 | #36 |
Frequently asked
Is deepseek-v3.2-low good at Research & Competitive Analysis?
deepseek-v3.2-low ranks #21 of 44 models we tested for Research & Competitive Analysis, scoring usable.
What is deepseek-v3.2-low's strongest Research & Competitive Analysis skill?
Its best sub-task here is Grounded Synthesis.
This page is Spring Prompt, running
We just did this for every model. Do it for your prompt.
The rankings above come from running real tasks through real models and scoring every output. Spring Prompt is that same engine — pointed at your prompt, your test cases, and your definition of good.
- Generate test cases from your prompt — no eval set required to start.
- Compare models side by side with quality, cost and latency in one matrix.
- Optimise the winner until the scores say it's ready to ship.
Experiment · Cold outreach email
Prompt × model results
12 test cases · 3 evalsClaude Opus
GPT-5
Gemini
v1
7.1
6.8
7.4
v2
8.3
7.9
8.0
v3
9.2
★
8.6
8.4
Best combo: v3 × Claude Opus
9.2 quality · $0.004/run · 1.8s