Is gemini-3.1-pro-preview-max good at Coding?
gemini-3.1-pro-preview-max ranks #22 of 52 for Coding — strong. The top pick for this task is claude-opus-4.8-medium.
gemini-3.1-pro-preview-max on each Coding sub-task
| Secure Implementation | 99.5/100 | #13 |
| Code Quality and Testing Test | 85.6/100 | #18 |
| API and Data Code Test | 79.0/100 | #6 |
| Refactoring | 74.0/100 | #41 |
| Code Review & Security | 51.0/100 | #52 |
Real examples, graded
WeakMissing authorization check (Ferrovia) 2/100
“The model triggered a false refusal on a standard, benign code review task. Although it correctly identified the vulnerability class (IDOR/BOLA) in its refusal message, it completely failed to fulfill the prompt's requirements to review the code and provide a concrete fix.”
WeakHMAC webhook verification with replay protection 0/100
“The model's response is incomplete and cuts off before implementing the actual webhook verification logic, including the timestamp check, signature verification, and replay protection. As a result, it fails all requirements.”
Frequently asked
Is gemini-3.1-pro-preview-max good at Coding?
gemini-3.1-pro-preview-max ranks #22 of 52 models we tested for Coding, scoring strong.
What is gemini-3.1-pro-preview-max's strongest Coding skill?
Its best sub-task here is Secure Implementation.
This page is Spring Prompt, running
We just did this for every model. Do it for your prompt.
The rankings above come from running real tasks through real models and scoring every output. Spring Prompt is that same engine — pointed at your prompt, your test cases, and your definition of good.
- Generate test cases from your prompt — no eval set required to start.
- Compare models side by side with quality, cost and latency in one matrix.
- Optimise the winner until the scores say it's ready to ship.
Prompt × model results
12 test cases · 3 evals