Confirm Action

Are you sure you want to proceed?

Is gemini-3.1-pro-preview-high good at Executive Assistant?

gemini-3.1-pro-preview-high ranks #8 of 50 for Executive Assistant — strong. The top pick for this task is claude-opus-4.5-high.

#8 / 50
Rank for this task
85.0
Score
$0.0338
Cost / run

gemini-3.1-pro-preview-high on each Executive Assistant sub-task

Priority Triage Test 88.7/100 #3
Message Risk Review 85.3/100 #4
Tactful Rewrite Test 83.7/100 #19
Useful in Five Minutes 82.3/100 #21

Real examples, graded

WinToo-blunt team feedback 90/100

“The candidate perfectly addresses the prompt with highly practical, empathetic, and business-appropriate advice, structured clearly and concisely.”

← Full gemini-3.1-pro-preview-high review All Executive Assistant rankings → Top pick: claude-opus-4.5-high →

Frequently asked

Is gemini-3.1-pro-preview-high good at Executive Assistant?

gemini-3.1-pro-preview-high ranks #8 of 50 models we tested for Executive Assistant, scoring strong.

What is gemini-3.1-pro-preview-high's strongest Executive Assistant skill?

Its best sub-task here is Priority Triage Test.

This page is Spring Prompt, running

We just did this for every model. Do it for your prompt.

The rankings above come from running real tasks through real models and scoring every output. Spring Prompt is that same engine — pointed at your prompt, your test cases, and your definition of good.

  • Generate test cases from your prompt — no eval set required to start.
  • Compare models side by side with quality, cost and latency in one matrix.
  • Optimise the winner until the scores say it's ready to ship.
Experiment · Cold outreach email

Prompt × model results

12 test cases · 3 evals
Claude Opus
GPT-5
Gemini
v1
7.1
6.8
7.4
v2
8.3
7.9
8.0
v3
9.2
8.6
8.4
Best combo: v3 × Claude Opus
9.2 quality · $0.004/run · 1.8s