Confirm Action

Are you sure you want to proceed?

Is gemini-3.1-pro-preview-medium good at Legal & HR?

gemini-3.1-pro-preview-medium ranks #21 of 69 for Legal & HR — excellent. The top pick for this task is claude-sonnet-4.6-high.

#21 / 69
Rank for this task
93.4
Score
$0.0354
Cost / run

gemini-3.1-pro-preview-medium on each Legal & HR sub-task

Structured Interview Kit 98.7/100 #36
Performance Feedback 98.7/100 #31
Contract Clause Review 95.7/100 #32
Job Description 90.7/100 #48
Plain-English Explainer 83.3/100 #23

Real examples, graded

WeakData-processing condition (Lumen) 75/100

“The model provides an excellent, highly readable plain-English explanation that perfectly preserves every material condition and nested exception without flattening the legal meaning. It does not fabricate any authority. However, it completely misses the requirement to include appropriate legal caveats and disclaimers.”

← Full gemini-3.1-pro-preview-medium review All Legal & HR rankings → Top pick: claude-sonnet-4.6-high →

Frequently asked

Is gemini-3.1-pro-preview-medium good at Legal & HR?

gemini-3.1-pro-preview-medium ranks #21 of 69 models we tested for Legal & HR, scoring excellent.

What is gemini-3.1-pro-preview-medium's strongest Legal & HR skill?

Its best sub-task here is Structured Interview Kit.

This page is Spring Prompt, running

We just did this for every model. Do it for your prompt.

The rankings above come from running real tasks through real models and scoring every output. Spring Prompt is that same engine — pointed at your prompt, your test cases, and your definition of good.

  • Generate test cases from your prompt — no eval set required to start.
  • Compare models side by side with quality, cost and latency in one matrix.
  • Optimise the winner until the scores say it's ready to ship.
Experiment · Cold outreach email

Prompt × model results

12 test cases · 3 evals
Claude Opus
GPT-5
Gemini
v1
7.1
6.8
7.4
v2
8.3
7.9
8.0
v3
9.2
8.6
8.4
Best combo: v3 × Claude Opus
9.2 quality · $0.004/run · 1.8s