Is gemini-3.1-pro-preview-low good at Research & Competitive Analysis?
gemini-3.1-pro-preview-low ranks #20 of 44 for Research & Competitive Analysis — usable. The top pick for this task is claude-opus-4.8-low.
gemini-3.1-pro-preview-low on each Research & Competitive Analysis sub-task
| SWOT & Strategy | 98.0/100 | #13 |
| Grounded Synthesis | 97.0/100 | #38 |
| Market Sizing | 68.5/100 | #23 |
| Competitive Teardown | 31.0/100 | #25 |
Real examples, graded
WeakSynthesize conflicting sources (Northwind) 78/100
“The model successfully grounds all claims in the provided sources, correctly attributes them, and flags the primary conflict regarding the customer count. However, it falls short of a perfect score because it fails to explicitly weight Source C as low-reliability and does not flag the '5% guarantee' as an uncorroborated claim, instead repeating it as a reported fact.”
Frequently asked
Is gemini-3.1-pro-preview-low good at Research & Competitive Analysis?
gemini-3.1-pro-preview-low ranks #20 of 44 models we tested for Research & Competitive Analysis, scoring usable.
What is gemini-3.1-pro-preview-low's strongest Research & Competitive Analysis skill?
Its best sub-task here is SWOT & Strategy.
This page is Spring Prompt, running
We just did this for every model. Do it for your prompt.
The rankings above come from running real tasks through real models and scoring every output. Spring Prompt is that same engine — pointed at your prompt, your test cases, and your definition of good.
- Generate test cases from your prompt — no eval set required to start.
- Compare models side by side with quality, cost and latency in one matrix.
- Optimise the winner until the scores say it's ready to ship.
Prompt × model results
12 test cases · 3 evals