Is gemini-3.1-pro-preview-low good at Summarization & Meeting Notes?
gemini-3.1-pro-preview-low ranks #3 of 44 for Summarization & Meeting Notes — excellent. The top pick for this task is claude-opus-4.5.
gemini-3.1-pro-preview-low on each Summarization & Meeting Notes sub-task
| Faithfulness Under Pressure | 100.0/100 | #4 |
| Action-Item Extraction | 99.7/100 | #8 |
| Transcript Q&A | 99.7/100 | #35 |
| Messy Transcript | 99.5/100 | #16 |
| Executive Summary | 98.5/100 | #6 |
Real examples, graded
WinTradewinds incident — commitments vs parked ideas 100/100
“The model perfectly extracts the action items, correctly identifying owners, deliverables, and deadlines where stated. It accurately notes when items were parked and correctly identifies that the data pull for no-show rates was not explicitly assigned to a single person in the transcript.”
Frequently asked
Is gemini-3.1-pro-preview-low good at Summarization & Meeting Notes?
gemini-3.1-pro-preview-low ranks #3 of 44 models we tested for Summarization & Meeting Notes, scoring excellent.
What is gemini-3.1-pro-preview-low's strongest Summarization & Meeting Notes skill?
Its best sub-task here is Faithfulness Under Pressure.
This page is Spring Prompt, running
We just did this for every model. Do it for your prompt.
The rankings above come from running real tasks through real models and scoring every output. Spring Prompt is that same engine — pointed at your prompt, your test cases, and your definition of good.
- Generate test cases from your prompt — no eval set required to start.
- Compare models side by side with quality, cost and latency in one matrix.
- Optimise the winner until the scores say it's ready to ship.
Prompt × model results
12 test cases · 3 evals