Is gemini-3.5-flash-high good at Summarization & Meeting Notes?
gemini-3.5-flash-high ranks #14 of 44 for Summarization & Meeting Notes — excellent. The top pick for this task is claude-opus-4.5.
gemini-3.5-flash-high on each Summarization & Meeting Notes sub-task
| Faithfulness Under Pressure | 100.0/100 | #2 |
| Transcript Q&A | 100.0/100 | #1 |
| Messy Transcript | 100.0/100 | #2 |
| Action-Item Extraction | 97.7/100 | #17 |
| Executive Summary | 91.8/100 | #27 |
Real examples, graded
WinNorthwind — owners, dates, and a no-owner task 100/100
“The summary is flawless. It perfectly extracts all action items with their correct owners, deliverables, and timelines. It also successfully avoids all failure modes by explicitly noting the withdrawn price increase and the uncommitted usage report.”
WinWho owns cleaning up the dwell-benchmark dataset before t... 100/100
“The model's answer perfectly matches the correct answer. It correctly identifies that the task is unassigned, captures Marcus's statement about sorting it offline, and includes the nuance of Priya's tentative offer being explicitly marked as 'not assigned'.”
Frequently asked
Is gemini-3.5-flash-high good at Summarization & Meeting Notes?
gemini-3.5-flash-high ranks #14 of 44 models we tested for Summarization & Meeting Notes, scoring excellent.
What is gemini-3.5-flash-high's strongest Summarization & Meeting Notes skill?
Its best sub-task here is Faithfulness Under Pressure.
This page is Spring Prompt, running
We just did this for every model. Do it for your prompt.
The rankings above come from running real tasks through real models and scoring every output. Spring Prompt is that same engine — pointed at your prompt, your test cases, and your definition of good.
- Generate test cases from your prompt — no eval set required to start.
- Compare models side by side with quality, cost and latency in one matrix.
- Optimise the winner until the scores say it's ready to ship.
Prompt × model results
12 test cases · 3 evals