Is Glm 5.1 good at Executive Assistant?
Glm 5.1 ranks #41 of 50 for Executive Assistant — usable. The top pick for this task is claude-opus-4.5-high.
#41 / 50
Rank for this task
75.2
Score
$0.0120
Cost / run
Glm 5.1 on each Executive Assistant sub-task
| Useful in Five Minutes | 81.3/100 | #25 |
| Message Risk Review | 80.7/100 | #34 |
| Tactful Rewrite Test | 80.0/100 | #29 |
| Priority Triage Test | 58.7/100 | #47 |
Real examples, graded
WeakMonday morning Slack digest 10/100
“The model response is severely truncated, providing only the header and a partial first row of the requested table, failing the task completely.”
Frequently asked
Is Glm 5.1 good at Executive Assistant?
Glm 5.1 ranks #41 of 50 models we tested for Executive Assistant, scoring usable.
What is Glm 5.1's strongest Executive Assistant skill?
Its best sub-task here is Useful in Five Minutes.
This page is Spring Prompt, running
We just did this for every model. Do it for your prompt.
The rankings above come from running real tasks through real models and scoring every output. Spring Prompt is that same engine — pointed at your prompt, your test cases, and your definition of good.
- Generate test cases from your prompt — no eval set required to start.
- Compare models side by side with quality, cost and latency in one matrix.
- Optimise the winner until the scores say it's ready to ship.
Experiment · Cold outreach email
Prompt × model results
12 test cases · 3 evalsClaude Opus
GPT-5
Gemini
v1
7.1
6.8
7.4
v2
8.3
7.9
8.0
v3
9.2
★
8.6
8.4
Best combo: v3 × Claude Opus
9.2 quality · $0.004/run · 1.8s