Is Glm 5.2 good at Structured Output?
Glm 5.2 ranks #25 of 113 for Structured Output — excellent. The top pick for this task is GPT-5.4 Mini (max reasoning).
Best result with medium reasoning effort.
#25 / 113
Rank for this task
97.1
Score
$0.0153
Cost / run
Glm 5.2 on each Structured Output sub-task
| Missing & Ambiguous Data | 100.0/100 | #9 |
| Extraction | 98.6/100 | #13 |
| Schema Adherence | 98.6/100 | #39 |
| Transformation | 96.6/100 | #45 |
| Noisy Structured Output Test | 92.4/100 | #40 |
Frequently asked
Is Glm 5.2 good at Structured Output?
Glm 5.2 ranks #25 of 113 models we tested for Structured Output, scoring excellent.
What is Glm 5.2's strongest Structured Output skill?
Its best sub-task here is Missing & Ambiguous Data.
This page is Spring Prompt, running in public
We just did this for every model. Do it for your prompt.
The rankings above come from running real tasks through real models and scoring every output. Spring Prompt is that same engine — pointed at your prompt, your test cases, and your definition of good.
- Generate test cases from your prompt — no eval set required to start.
- Compare models side by side with quality, cost and latency in one matrix.
- Optimise the winner until the scores say it's ready to ship.
Experiment · Cold outreach email
Prompt × model results
12 test cases · 3 evalsClaude Opus
GPT-5
Gemini
v1
7.1
6.8
7.4
v2
8.3
7.9
8.0
v3
9.2
★
8.6
8.4
Best combo: v3 × Claude Opus
9.2 quality · $0.004/run · 1.8s