Confirm Action

Are you sure you want to proceed?

Is glm-5-max good at Coding?

glm-5-max ranks #24 of 52 for Coding — strong. The top pick for this task is claude-opus-4.8-medium.

#24 / 52
Rank for this task
80.6
Score
$0.0172
Cost / run

glm-5-max on each Coding sub-task

Refactoring 100.0/100 #4
Code Review & Security 99.0/100 #23
Code Quality and Testing Test 84.2/100 #20
Secure Implementation 70.0/100 #47
API and Data Code Test 66.4/100 #24

Real examples, graded

WeakParameterized query + safe lookup (Ferrovia) 36/100

“The code fails at runtime due to a missing import for psycopg2.extras.”

WeakPandas transformation 8/100

“The model generated a chain-of-thought draft but cut off abruptly before providing the actual requested code and explanation. It completely fails the requirement to produce a complete, ready-to-use answer.”

← Full glm-5-max review All Coding rankings → Top pick: claude-opus-4.8-medium →

Frequently asked

Is glm-5-max good at Coding?

glm-5-max ranks #24 of 52 models we tested for Coding, scoring strong.

What is glm-5-max's strongest Coding skill?

Its best sub-task here is Refactoring.

This page is Spring Prompt, running

We just did this for every model. Do it for your prompt.

The rankings above come from running real tasks through real models and scoring every output. Spring Prompt is that same engine — pointed at your prompt, your test cases, and your definition of good.

  • Generate test cases from your prompt — no eval set required to start.
  • Compare models side by side with quality, cost and latency in one matrix.
  • Optimise the winner until the scores say it's ready to ship.
Experiment · Cold outreach email

Prompt × model results

12 test cases · 3 evals
Claude Opus
GPT-5
Gemini
v1
7.1
6.8
7.4
v2
8.3
7.9
8.0
v3
9.2
8.6
8.4
Best combo: v3 × Claude Opus
9.2 quality · $0.004/run · 1.8s