Models / Gemini 4 Hydrogen
Google
Gemini 4 Hydrogen
Gemini 4 Hydrogen is best for speed under pressure; pick it when quality matters more than cost.
Results 13 Nov 2026 · 95 results · 5 sources
Test Gemini 4 Hydrogen on your prompt → It runs beside the models you could use instead, with every answer checked and costed.
- Price per million tokens
- $1.50 in · $7.50 out
Google's list price, 10 Nov 2026 · compare prices$0.07 cached input · 50% off in batch - Speed
- Not measured
- Intelligence Index
- Not measured
- Spring Prompt overall
- 10th of 35 score 65 of 100 · how it works
- Spring Prompt Score
- 64 of 100 8th of 31 · 5 of 5 benchmarks · our own tests only
- Developer
- Google, based in the US
Weights not published - Released
- Not recorded
no launch date in our tracker or our sources
1,048,576 tokens of context - Pricing and availability
- Same price across the full 1M context.
Where it stands among the models you could choose
Available models grouped by price, intelligence, speed and developer location. Retired models are excluded.
| Among | Intelligence Index | Spring Prompt overall | Price, blended | Speed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Models available today | – | 11th of 34Claude Fable 5.2 | $3.00 blended, 73rd percentilecheapest: Mistral Nemo | – |
| Models priced $3–10 per million tokens | – | 7th of 15Claude Opus 5.5 | sets this group | – |
| Models from developers based in the US | – | 10th of 21Claude Fable 5.2 | $3.00 blended, 53rd percentilecheapest: Gemma 3 4B | – |
The name under each rank is the leader of that group; green is the top quarter of the group and red the bottom quarter, by rank. Price is shown as a percentile: the share of the group that costs less, so lower is cheaper. "Sets this group" marks the measure the group is defined by. Spring Prompt overall is our score out of 100 across every source (how it works). Price is the developer's list price (or the typical OpenRouter host where we haven't read one) for three input tokens to one output; intelligence and speed are from Artificial Analysis (data sourced from Artificial Analysis); "similar intelligence" means within 4 points on its Intelligence Index. Developer locations are where each company is based, not where a model is served. Groups under 3 models are not ranked.
Measured cost per task
API cost recorded in our benchmark runs, excluding judging.
| Task | Benchmark | Cost per task |
|---|---|---|
| Product listing | CatalogBench | ≈ $0.022 |
| Deck | DeckBench | ≈ $0.250 |
| Survey plan and analysis | SurveyBench | ≈ $0.336 |
| Game of blitz chess | BulletBench | ≈ $0.163 |
Cheapest model that passes
On our benchmarks that define a pass for each task: what one passing answer cost in our run, failed attempts included, and whether a cheaper model passed.
- CatalogBench · cost per 1,000 accepted listings
Gemini 4 Hydrogen passed 125 of 168 attempts, with no estimate: failed-call costs incomplete. Cheapest: GPT-6 Luna at $0.70 (114 of 168 attempts). - DeckBench · cost per presentable deck
Gemini 4 Hydrogen: no presentable decks (0 of 6 tasks). Cheapest: GPT-6.1 Terra at $0.13 (3 of 6 tasks). - SurveyBench · cost per sound survey task
Gemini 4 Hydrogen: $3.03 (1 of 9 tasks), 10 of 11. Cheapest: GPT-6 Luna at $0.03 (3 of 9 tasks). It passed at least as often.
Cost per attempt divided by the share that passed, at the run date's prices, excluding judging. Each model at its cheapest setting per passing answer. With a handful of tasks, a pass or two either way is within chance. No estimate where a run had missing outputs, because their cost may not have been recorded.
How good is it, and for what?
Each use case ranks the available models its benchmarks measured, then those priced $3–10 per million tokens. The bar shows its percentile in that field, best to the right. Open a row for the results behind it.
Product listingsTurning a sparse product feed and photos into listings that can go live
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Hydrogen | Rank among available | Best available |
|---|---|---|---|
| CatalogBenchCatalogBench: reliably publish-ready | 62.5% | 7th of 31 | GPT-6 Astra 75.0% |
| CatalogBenchCatalogBench (sales brief): reliably publish-ready | 23.2% | 11th of 31 | GPT-6 Astra 69.6% |
Decks from an analysisTurning a finished analysis into a deck you could present as it is
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Hydrogen | Rank among available | Best available |
|---|---|---|---|
| DeckBenchDeckBench: deck rating | 1,147 | 16th of 31 | GPT-6 Astra 1,584 |
User surveysPlanning a user survey and reading its results without being misled
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Hydrogen | Rank among available | Best available |
|---|---|---|---|
| SurveyBenchSurveyBench: analysis rating | 1,117 | 10th of 22 | Claude Fable 5.2 1,665 |
Marketing planningPlanning a year of ad spend without overspending
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Hydrogen | Rank among available | Best available |
|---|---|---|---|
| ROASBenchROASBench: overall score | 45.4 | 15th of 31 | Claude Fable 5.2 61.3 |
Agents and tool useMulti-step tasks with tools: support desks, coding agents, function calls
- tau2-bench: has not measured this model.
- Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4: has not measured this model.
- OpenHands Index: has not measured this model.
- Microsoft STATE-Bench: has not measured this model.
- Artificial Analysis: has not measured this model.
- Vending-Bench 2: has not measured this model.
Professional workReal tasks from banking, consulting and law, business documents and freelance projects
- APEX-Agents: has not measured this model.
- GDP.pdf: has not measured this model.
- Remote Labor Index: has not measured this model.
Reasoning and knowledgeHard questions across science, maths and general knowledge
- Artificial Analysis: has not measured this model.
WritingWhat people prefer in blind comparisons, and judged writing quality
- Arena (formerly LMArena): has not measured this model.
- UGI Leaderboard: has not measured this model.
Sticking to the factsSummarising without inventing things, and factual answers
- Vectara Hallucination Leaderboard: has not measured this model.
- Arena (formerly LMArena): has not measured this model.
- SimpleQA Verified (Epoch AI): has not measured this model.
Speed under pressureGood decisions against a real clock (fast chess)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Hydrogen | Rank among available | Best available |
|---|---|---|---|
| BulletBenchBulletBench Bullet 60s: ladder Elo | 557 | 8th of 32 | Gemini 3.8 Flash 1,068 |
Nearest alternatives
- The most capable open-weights modelMiMo-V2.6-Pro$0.54 blended · Intelligence Index 46.3
Against Gemini 4 Hydrogen at $3.00 blended. "Similar intelligence" means within 4 points or better.
Against the alternatives
The models you would most likely weigh it against: the leaders of the groups above.
Scroll sideways to see every alternative.
| Gemini 4 Hydrogen | Claude Opus 5.5 highest-scoring overall at $3–10 per million tokens | Claude Fable 5.2 highest-scoring overall available today | Muse Ember just above overall | Claude Fable 5.1 just below overall | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price per million tokens | $3.00 | $8.00 | $16.00 | $0.20 | $20.00 |
| Tokens a second | – | 96 | – | – | 72 |
| Intelligence Index | – | 57.6 | – | – | 53.4 |
| Spring Prompt overall | 65 | 82 | 91 | 65 | 65 |
| Rank among available models, by use case | |||||
| Product listings | 8th of 31 | 13th | 5th | 10th | 22nd |
| Decks from an analysis | 16th of 31 | 5th | 3rd | 15th | 10th |
| User surveys | 10th of 22 | 4th | 1st | 5th | – |
| Marketing planning | 15th of 31 | 9th | 1st | 8th | 10th |
| Agents and tool use | – | 3rd | – | – | 19th |
| Professional work | – | 3rd | – | – | 4th |
| Reasoning and knowledge | – | 1st | – | – | 5th |
| Writing | – | 5th | – | – | 19th |
| Sticking to the facts | – | 3rd | – | – | 5th |
| Speed under pressure | 5th of 34 | – | 8th | 21st | – |
| Side by side → | Side by side → | Side by side → | Side by side → | ||
Shaded figures are better than Gemini 4 Hydrogen's. A dash means no result.
Research and examples
In the playground: our pick in 0 of 2 tests, 93% of checks passed →
- Pelican riding a bicycle (3 of 3 checks)
- Make a stained glass window of a hummingbird and flowers (3.5 of 4 checks)
Where it has been measured
Among models available today, in the top quarter (by percentile) for speed under pressure.
Not timed: Artificial Analysis, our source for speed, has not tested it
- BulletBench15 results
- CatalogBench32 results
- DeckBench18 results
- ROASBench9 results
- SurveyBench21 results
- APEX-AgentsNot measured
- Arena (formerly LMArena)Not measured
- Artificial AnalysisNot measured
- Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4Not measured
- GDP.pdfNot measured
- Microsoft STATE-BenchNot measured
- OpenHands IndexNot measured
- Remote Labor IndexNot measured
- SimpleQA Verified (Epoch AI)Not measured
- tau2-benchNot measured
- UGI LeaderboardNot measured
- Vectara Hallucination LeaderboardNot measured
- Vending-Bench 2Not measured
Every result
95 published results from 5 sources, each in the source's own units, with the configuration that produced it.
BulletBench · measured by Spring Prompt · 15 results
| Measure | Value | Rank | Configuration | Dated |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BulletBench Blitz 3+2: cost per gameUS dollars, lower is better | $0.16 | 14 of 21 | Gemini 4 Hydrogen provider default reasoning |
12 Nov 2026 |
| BulletBench Blitz 3+2: games lost on time% of games, lower is better | 50.0% | 14 of 21 | Gemini 4 Hydrogen provider default reasoning |
12 Nov 2026 |
| BulletBench Blitz 3+2: invalid moves% of moves, lower is better | 0.0% | 1 of 21 | Gemini 4 Hydrogen provider default reasoning |
12 Nov 2026 |
| BulletBench Blitz 3+2: ladder Eloladder Elo, higher is better | 1,052 770–1,302 |
4 of 21 | Gemini 4 Hydrogen provider default reasoning |
12 Nov 2026 |
| BulletBench Blitz 3+2: median move timemilliseconds, lower is better | 6.6 s | 16 of 21 | Gemini 4 Hydrogen provider default reasoning |
12 Nov 2026 |
| BulletBench Bullet 60s: cost per gameUS dollars, lower is better | $0.0451 | 62 of 70 | Gemini 4 Hydrogen provider default reasoning |
13 Nov 2026 |
| BulletBench Bullet 60s: cost per gameUS dollars, lower is better | $0.0439 | 60 of 70 | Gemini 4 Hydrogen (low reasoning) low reasoning |
13 Nov 2026 |
| BulletBench Bullet 60s: games lost on time% of games, lower is better | 62.5% | 48 of 70 | Gemini 4 Hydrogen provider default reasoning |
13 Nov 2026 |
| BulletBench Bullet 60s: games lost on time% of games, lower is better | 62.5% | 48 of 70 | Gemini 4 Hydrogen (low reasoning) low reasoning |
13 Nov 2026 |
| BulletBench Bullet 60s: invalid moves% of moves, lower is better | 0.0% | 1 of 70 | Gemini 4 Hydrogen provider default reasoning |
13 Nov 2026 |
| BulletBench Bullet 60s: invalid moves% of moves, lower is better | 0.0% | 1 of 70 | Gemini 4 Hydrogen (low reasoning) low reasoning |
13 Nov 2026 |
| BulletBench Bullet 60s: ladder Eloladder Elo, higher is better | 557 370–727 |
24 of 70 | Gemini 4 Hydrogen provider default reasoning |
13 Nov 2026 |
| BulletBench Bullet 60s: ladder Eloladder Elo, higher is better | 557 370–727 |
24 of 70 | Gemini 4 Hydrogen (low reasoning) low reasoning |
13 Nov 2026 |
| BulletBench Bullet 60s: median move timemilliseconds, lower is better | 3.4 s | 65 of 70 | Gemini 4 Hydrogen provider default reasoning |
13 Nov 2026 |
| BulletBench Bullet 60s: median move timemilliseconds, lower is better | 2.6 s | 52 of 70 | Gemini 4 Hydrogen (low reasoning) low reasoning |
13 Nov 2026 |
Not shown: Not your cost: prices are those charged on the run date.
CatalogBench · measured by Spring Prompt · 32 results
| Measure | Value | Rank | Configuration | Dated |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CatalogBench (sales brief): channel rules broken% of products, lower is better | 0.6% | 17 of 34 | Gemini 4 Hydrogen provider default reasoning |
12 Nov 2026 |
| CatalogBench (sales brief): claims to check% of products, lower is better | 0.6% | 19 of 31 | Gemini 4 Hydrogen provider default reasoning |
12 Nov 2026 |
| CatalogBench (sales brief): content quality% of checks, higher is better | 97.1% | 18 of 34 | Gemini 4 Hydrogen provider default reasoning |
12 Nov 2026 |
| CatalogBench (sales brief): failed outputs% of products, lower is better | 1.2% | 27 of 34 | Gemini 4 Hydrogen provider default reasoning |
12 Nov 2026 |
| CatalogBench (sales brief): missing UK information% of products, lower is better | 0.0% | 1 of 34 | Gemini 4 Hydrogen provider default reasoning |
12 Nov 2026 |
| CatalogBench (sales brief): not findable% of products, lower is better | 2.4% | 11 of 34 | Gemini 4 Hydrogen provider default reasoning |
12 Nov 2026 |
| CatalogBench (sales brief): publish-ready listings% of products, higher is better | 42.9% | 13 of 34 | Gemini 4 Hydrogen provider default reasoning |
12 Nov 2026 |
| CatalogBench (sales brief): reliably publish-ready% of products, higher is better | 23.2% | 11 of 33 | Gemini 4 Hydrogen provider default reasoning |
12 Nov 2026 |
| CatalogBench (sales brief): unsupported claims% of products, lower is better | 48.8% | 15 of 34 | Gemini 4 Hydrogen provider default reasoning |
12 Nov 2026 |
| CatalogBench (sales brief): unsupported claimsclaims per product, lower is better | 1.27 | 14 of 34 | Gemini 4 Hydrogen provider default reasoning |
12 Nov 2026 |
| CatalogBench (sales brief): wrong attributes% of products, lower is better | 14.3% | 5 of 34 | Gemini 4 Hydrogen provider default reasoning |
12 Nov 2026 |
| CatalogBench (sales brief): wrong category or variant% of products, lower is better | 1.8% | 6 of 34 | Gemini 4 Hydrogen provider default reasoning |
12 Nov 2026 |
| CatalogBench: channel compliance% of products, higher is better | 100.0% | 1 of 34 | Gemini 4 Hydrogen provider default reasoning |
12 Nov 2026 |
| CatalogBench: channel rules broken% of products, lower is better | 0.0% | 1 of 34 | Gemini 4 Hydrogen provider default reasoning |
12 Nov 2026 |
| CatalogBench: claims to check% of products, lower is better | 0.0% | 1 of 31 | Gemini 4 Hydrogen provider default reasoning |
12 Nov 2026 |
| CatalogBench: conflicts caught% of conflicts, higher is better | 100.0% | 1 of 34 | Gemini 4 Hydrogen provider default reasoning |
12 Nov 2026 |
| CatalogBench: content quality% of checks, higher is better | 97.7% | 9 of 34 | Gemini 4 Hydrogen provider default reasoning |
12 Nov 2026 |
| CatalogBench: cost per productUS dollars, lower is better | $0.0219 | 24 of 34 | Gemini 4 Hydrogen provider default reasoning |
12 Nov 2026 |
| CatalogBench: decision accuracy% of decisions, higher is better | 97.5% | 11 of 34 | Gemini 4 Hydrogen provider default reasoning |
12 Nov 2026 |
| CatalogBench: failed outputs% of products, lower is better | 0.6% | 26 of 34 | Gemini 4 Hydrogen provider default reasoning |
12 Nov 2026 |
| CatalogBench: field accuracy% of missing fields, higher is better | 92.7% | 23 of 34 | Gemini 4 Hydrogen provider default reasoning |
12 Nov 2026 |
| CatalogBench: invented values% of filled values, lower is better | 0.0% | 1 of 34 | Gemini 4 Hydrogen provider default reasoning |
12 Nov 2026 |
| CatalogBench: missing UK information% of products, lower is better | 0.0% | 1 of 34 | Gemini 4 Hydrogen provider default reasoning |
12 Nov 2026 |
| CatalogBench: not findable% of products, lower is better | 3.0% | 9 of 34 | Gemini 4 Hydrogen provider default reasoning |
12 Nov 2026 |
| CatalogBench: output tokens per producttokens, lower is better | 2,416 | 6 of 11 | Gemini 4 Hydrogen provider default reasoning |
12 Nov 2026 |
| CatalogBench: publish-ready listings% of products, higher is better | 74.4% | 7 of 34 | Gemini 4 Hydrogen provider default reasoning |
12 Nov 2026 |
| CatalogBench: reliably publish-ready% of products, higher is better | 62.5% | 7 of 33 | Gemini 4 Hydrogen provider default reasoning |
12 Nov 2026 |
| CatalogBench: time per productseconds, lower is better | 20.1 | 20 of 34 | Gemini 4 Hydrogen provider default reasoning |
12 Nov 2026 |
| CatalogBench: unsupported claims% of products, lower is better | 9.5% | 12 of 34 | Gemini 4 Hydrogen provider default reasoning |
12 Nov 2026 |
| CatalogBench: unsupported claimsclaims per product, lower is better | 0.24 | 8 of 34 | Gemini 4 Hydrogen provider default reasoning |
12 Nov 2026 |
| CatalogBench: wrong attributes% of products, lower is better | 13.1% | 4 of 34 | Gemini 4 Hydrogen provider default reasoning |
12 Nov 2026 |
| CatalogBench: wrong category or variant% of products, lower is better | 1.8% | 6 of 34 | Gemini 4 Hydrogen provider default reasoning |
12 Nov 2026 |
Not shown: Not your catalogue: invented products with generated images, so a model's result on your own feed can differ.
DeckBench · measured by Spring Prompt · 18 results
| Measure | Value | Rank | Configuration | Dated |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeckBench: accurate decks% of tasks, higher is better | 66.7% | 9 of 33 | Gemini 4 Hydrogen provider default reasoning |
12 Nov 2026 |
| DeckBench: caveat dropped% of tasks, lower is better | 16.7% | 15 of 33 | Gemini 4 Hydrogen provider default reasoning |
12 Nov 2026 |
| DeckBench: clean layout% of tasks, higher is better | 0.0% | 28 of 33 | Gemini 4 Hydrogen provider default reasoning |
12 Nov 2026 |
| DeckBench: cost per deckUS dollars, lower is better | $0.25 | 26 of 33 | Gemini 4 Hydrogen provider default reasoning |
12 Nov 2026 |
| DeckBench: deck ratingrating, higher is better | 1,147 1,036–1,253 |
16 of 33 | Gemini 4 Hydrogen provider default reasoning |
12 Nov 2026 |
| DeckBench: design quality% of the maximum, higher is better | 67.6% | 13 of 33 | Gemini 4 Hydrogen provider default reasoning |
12 Nov 2026 |
| DeckBench: draft figure quoted% of tasks, lower is better | 0.0% | 1 of 33 | Gemini 4 Hydrogen provider default reasoning |
12 Nov 2026 |
| DeckBench: findings missing% of tasks, lower is better | 0.0% | 1 of 33 | Gemini 4 Hydrogen provider default reasoning |
12 Nov 2026 |
| DeckBench: head-to-head win rate% of comparisons, higher is better | 47.5% | 22 of 33 | Gemini 4 Hydrogen provider default reasoning |
12 Nov 2026 |
| DeckBench: layout defects% of tasks, lower is better | 100.0% | 28 of 33 | Gemini 4 Hydrogen provider default reasoning |
12 Nov 2026 |
| DeckBench: misleading metric used% of tasks, lower is better | 0.0% | 1 of 33 | Gemini 4 Hydrogen provider default reasoning |
12 Nov 2026 |
| DeckBench: output tokens per decktokens, lower is better | 31,368 | 7 of 12 | Gemini 4 Hydrogen provider default reasoning |
12 Nov 2026 |
| DeckBench: presentable decks% of tasks, higher is better | 0.0% | 15 of 33 | Gemini 4 Hydrogen provider default reasoning |
12 Nov 2026 |
| DeckBench: recommendation late or wrong% of tasks, lower is better | 0.0% | 1 of 33 | Gemini 4 Hydrogen provider default reasoning |
12 Nov 2026 |
| DeckBench: slides needing work% of tasks, lower is better | 16.7% | 3 of 33 | Gemini 4 Hydrogen provider default reasoning |
12 Nov 2026 |
| DeckBench: time per deckseconds, lower is better | 202 | 23 of 33 | Gemini 4 Hydrogen provider default reasoning |
12 Nov 2026 |
| DeckBench: unsupported claims% of tasks, lower is better | 16.7% | 15 of 33 | Gemini 4 Hydrogen provider default reasoning |
12 Nov 2026 |
| DeckBench: unsupported numbers% of tasks, lower is better | 0.0% | 1 of 33 | Gemini 4 Hydrogen provider default reasoning |
12 Nov 2026 |
Not shown: Not your analysis or your brand: invented companies, six public tasks, one deck per model per task at the provider's default reasoning setting.
ROASBench · measured by Spring Prompt · 9 results
| Measure | Value | Rank | Configuration | Dated |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROASBench: audience scorescore out of 100, higher is better | 67.0 | 11 of 34 | Gemini 4 Hydrogen provider default reasoning |
12 Nov 2026 |
| ROASBench: business scorescore out of 100, higher is better | 41.6 | 15 of 34 | Gemini 4 Hydrogen provider default reasoning |
12 Nov 2026 |
| ROASBench: consistency scorescore out of 100, higher is better | 29.8 | 15 of 34 | Gemini 4 Hydrogen provider default reasoning |
12 Nov 2026 |
| ROASBench: contribution profitsimulated US dollars, higher is better | $699,863 | 9 of 34 | Gemini 4 Hydrogen provider default reasoning |
12 Nov 2026 |
| ROASBench: cost of a runUS dollars, lower is better | $0.44 | 24 of 34 | Gemini 4 Hydrogen provider default reasoning |
12 Nov 2026 |
| ROASBench: months over budgetmonths of 12, lower is better | 0 | 1 of 34 | Gemini 4 Hydrogen provider default reasoning |
12 Nov 2026 |
| ROASBench: overall scorescore out of 100, higher is better | 45.4 | 15 of 34 | Gemini 4 Hydrogen provider default reasoning |
12 Nov 2026 |
| ROASBench: planning scorescore out of 100, higher is better | 55.0 | 5 of 34 | Gemini 4 Hydrogen provider default reasoning |
12 Nov 2026 |
| ROASBench: return on ad spendprofit per $1 spent, higher is better | $0.53 | 15 of 34 | Gemini 4 Hydrogen provider default reasoning |
12 Nov 2026 |
Not shown: Not real ad performance: the market is a deterministic simulation of one invented skincare brand.
SurveyBench · measured by Spring Prompt · 21 results
| Measure | Value | Rank | Configuration | Dated |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SurveyBench: analysis ratingrating, higher is better | 1,117 1,019–1,219 |
10 of 24 | Gemini 4 Hydrogen provider default reasoning |
12 Nov 2026 |
| SurveyBench: analysis scorepoints of 100, higher is better | 79.5 | 13 of 24 | Gemini 4 Hydrogen provider default reasoning |
12 Nov 2026 |
| SurveyBench: cost per taskUS dollars, lower is better | $0.34 | 19 of 23 | Gemini 4 Hydrogen provider default reasoning |
12 Nov 2026 |
| SurveyBench: head-to-head win rate% of comparisons, higher is better | 55.4% | 11 of 24 | Gemini 4 Hydrogen provider default reasoning |
12 Nov 2026 |
| SurveyBench: leading or double-barrelled questions% of tasks, lower is better | 44.4% | 12 of 24 | Gemini 4 Hydrogen provider default reasoning |
12 Nov 2026 |
| SurveyBench: mistaken next steps% of tasks, lower is better | 11.1% | 5 of 24 | Gemini 4 Hydrogen provider default reasoning |
12 Nov 2026 |
| SurveyBench: numbers right% of answers, higher is better | 100.0% | 1 of 24 | Gemini 4 Hydrogen provider default reasoning |
12 Nov 2026 |
| SurveyBench: objectives unanswerable% of tasks, lower is better | 0.0% | 1 of 24 | Gemini 4 Hydrogen provider default reasoning |
12 Nov 2026 |
| SurveyBench: output tokens per tasktokens, lower is better | 41,542 | 9 of 13 | Gemini 4 Hydrogen provider default reasoning |
12 Nov 2026 |
| SurveyBench: precision ignored% of tasks, lower is better | 0.0% | 1 of 24 | Gemini 4 Hydrogen provider default reasoning |
12 Nov 2026 |
| SurveyBench: research scorepoints of 100, higher is better | 83.7 | 12 of 24 | Gemini 4 Hydrogen provider default reasoning |
12 Nov 2026 |
| SurveyBench: sound research% of tasks, higher is better | 11.1% | 10 of 24 | Gemini 4 Hydrogen provider default reasoning |
12 Nov 2026 |
| SurveyBench: stakeholder's view presumed% of tasks, lower is better | 22.2% | 14 of 24 | Gemini 4 Hydrogen provider default reasoning |
12 Nov 2026 |
| SurveyBench: survey plan scorepoints of 100, higher is better | 93.5 | 8 of 24 | Gemini 4 Hydrogen provider default reasoning |
12 Nov 2026 |
| SurveyBench: survey structure% of tasks, lower is better | 11.1% | 3 of 24 | Gemini 4 Hydrogen provider default reasoning |
12 Nov 2026 |
| SurveyBench: time per taskseconds, lower is better | 267 | 17 of 23 | Gemini 4 Hydrogen provider default reasoning |
12 Nov 2026 |
| SurveyBench: traps handled% of traps, higher is better | 89.9% | 13 of 24 | Gemini 4 Hydrogen provider default reasoning |
12 Nov 2026 |
| SurveyBench: traps missed% of tasks, lower is better | 66.7% | 12 of 24 | Gemini 4 Hydrogen provider default reasoning |
12 Nov 2026 |
| SurveyBench: unsupported findings% of tasks, lower is better | 33.3% | 8 of 24 | Gemini 4 Hydrogen provider default reasoning |
12 Nov 2026 |
| SurveyBench: wrong numbers% of tasks, lower is better | 0.0% | 1 of 24 | Gemini 4 Hydrogen provider default reasoning |
12 Nov 2026 |
| SurveyBench: wrong recommendation% of tasks, lower is better | 33.3% | 15 of 24 | Gemini 4 Hydrogen provider default reasoning |
12 Nov 2026 |
Not shown: Not your customers or your data: invented organisations with simulated respondents, nine public tasks, one run per model per task at the provider's default reasoning setting.
Embed a score badge
A badge for its Spring Prompt Score and each of our benchmarks that ranked Gemini 4 Hydrogen, from the current results. Paste the code into a page or README; it links back to where the result comes from.
Spring Prompt Score · 5 of 5 benchmarks
<a href="https://springprompt.com/score#google-gemini-4-hydrogen"><img src="https://springprompt.com/badge/score/google-gemini-4-hydrogen.svg" alt="Gemini 4 Hydrogen is #8 of 31 on the Spring Prompt Score (64 of 100, from 5 of 5 of our benchmarks), measured by Spring Prompt" height="20"></a>
CatalogBench · Reliably publish-ready, factual brief
<a href="https://springprompt.com/benchmarks/catalogbench?focus=google-gemini-4-hydrogen"><img src="https://springprompt.com/badge/catalogbench/google-gemini-4-hydrogen.svg" alt="Gemini 4 Hydrogen is #7 of 31 on CatalogBench (Reliably publish-ready, factual brief: 62.5%), measured by Spring Prompt" height="20"></a>
DeckBench · Deck rating
<a href="https://springprompt.com/benchmarks/deckbench?focus=google-gemini-4-hydrogen"><img src="https://springprompt.com/badge/deckbench/google-gemini-4-hydrogen.svg" alt="Gemini 4 Hydrogen is #16 of 32 on DeckBench (Deck rating: 1,147), measured by Spring Prompt" height="20"></a>
SurveyBench · Analysis rating
<a href="https://springprompt.com/benchmarks/surveybench?focus=google-gemini-4-hydrogen"><img src="https://springprompt.com/badge/surveybench/google-gemini-4-hydrogen.svg" alt="Gemini 4 Hydrogen is #10 of 23 on SurveyBench (Analysis rating: 1,117), measured by Spring Prompt" height="20"></a>
ROASBench · Score
<a href="https://springprompt.com/benchmarks/roasbench?focus=google-gemini-4-hydrogen"><img src="https://springprompt.com/badge/roasbench/google-gemini-4-hydrogen.svg" alt="Gemini 4 Hydrogen is #15 of 32 on ROASBench (Score: 45.4), measured by Spring Prompt" height="20"></a>
BulletBench · Ladder Elo
<a href="https://springprompt.com/benchmarks/bulletbench?focus=google-gemini-4-hydrogen"><img src="https://springprompt.com/badge/bulletbench/google-gemini-4-hydrogen.svg" alt="Gemini 4 Hydrogen is #24 of 58 on BulletBench (Ladder Elo: 557), measured by Spring Prompt" height="20"></a>Will Gemini 4 Hydrogen work for your product?
Benchmarks aren't your task. Paste the prompt your product uses and run it beside the models you could use instead, with every answer checked and costed.
New here? Your email starts a free trial. No credit card needed.