Confirm Action

Are you sure you want to proceed?

Is GPT 5.4 Nano good at Chef / Home Cooking?

GPT 5.4 Nano ranks #44 of 50 for Chef / Home Cooking — needs editing. The top pick for this task is gemini-3.1-pro-preview-high.

#44 / 50
Rank for this task
63.6
Score
$0.0204
Cost / run

GPT 5.4 Nano on each Chef / Home Cooking sub-task

Substitution Test 78.7/100 #44
Dinner Rescue Test 68.7/100 #46
Practical Recipe Test 68.3/100 #45
Meal Timing Test 38.7/100 #43

Real examples, graded

WeakQuick chicken thighs with limited ingredients 48/100

“The recipe fails practically by instructing the user to dump a wet tomato sauce and chicken into a pot of almost-cooked rice, which will result in a mushy texture, and the timing notes present sequential steps that exceed the 30-minute limit while falsely claiming a 27-30 minute total.”

← Full GPT 5.4 Nano review All Chef / Home Cooking rankings → Top pick: gemini-3.1-pro-preview-high →

Frequently asked

Is GPT 5.4 Nano good at Chef / Home Cooking?

GPT 5.4 Nano ranks #44 of 50 models we tested for Chef / Home Cooking, scoring needs editing.

What is GPT 5.4 Nano's strongest Chef / Home Cooking skill?

Its best sub-task here is Substitution Test.

This page is Spring Prompt, running

We just did this for every model. Do it for your prompt.

The rankings above come from running real tasks through real models and scoring every output. Spring Prompt is that same engine — pointed at your prompt, your test cases, and your definition of good.

  • Generate test cases from your prompt — no eval set required to start.
  • Compare models side by side with quality, cost and latency in one matrix.
  • Optimise the winner until the scores say it's ready to ship.
Experiment · Cold outreach email

Prompt × model results

12 test cases · 3 evals
Claude Opus
GPT-5
Gemini
v1
7.1
6.8
7.4
v2
8.3
7.9
8.0
v3
9.2
8.6
8.4
Best combo: v3 × Claude Opus
9.2 quality · $0.004/run · 1.8s