Confirm Action

Are you sure you want to proceed?

Is Kimi k2.5 good at Executive Assistant?

Kimi k2.5 ranks #47 of 50 for Executive Assistant — usable. The top pick for this task is claude-opus-4.5-high.

#47 / 50
Rank for this task
71.2
Score
$0.0131
Cost / run

Kimi k2.5 on each Executive Assistant sub-task

Message Risk Review 82.7/100 #24
Tactful Rewrite Test 77.7/100 #35
Useful in Five Minutes 67.0/100 #44
Priority Triage Test 57.3/100 #48

Real examples, graded

WeakClient escalation prep 38/100

“The model invents several critical facts not present in the prompt (e.g., interim safeguards, a 48-hour ETA, specific technical causes), which creates severe risk in a client escalation scenario.”

WeakNoisy founder inbox 18/100

“The model provides a lengthy chain of thought but cuts off before generating the requested table, completely failing to deliver the final output.”

← Full Kimi k2.5 review All Executive Assistant rankings → Top pick: claude-opus-4.5-high →

Frequently asked

Is Kimi k2.5 good at Executive Assistant?

Kimi k2.5 ranks #47 of 50 models we tested for Executive Assistant, scoring usable.

What is Kimi k2.5's strongest Executive Assistant skill?

Its best sub-task here is Message Risk Review.

This page is Spring Prompt, running

We just did this for every model. Do it for your prompt.

The rankings above come from running real tasks through real models and scoring every output. Spring Prompt is that same engine — pointed at your prompt, your test cases, and your definition of good.

  • Generate test cases from your prompt — no eval set required to start.
  • Compare models side by side with quality, cost and latency in one matrix.
  • Optimise the winner until the scores say it's ready to ship.
Experiment · Cold outreach email

Prompt × model results

12 test cases · 3 evals
Claude Opus
GPT-5
Gemini
v1
7.1
6.8
7.4
v2
8.3
7.9
8.0
v3
9.2
8.6
8.4
Best combo: v3 × Claude Opus
9.2 quality · $0.004/run · 1.8s