Confirm Action

Are you sure you want to proceed?

Is Mistral Medium 3.1 good at Executive Assistant?

Mistral Medium 3.1 ranks #44 of 50 for Executive Assistant — usable. The top pick for this task is claude-opus-4.5-high.

#44 / 50
Rank for this task
73.2
Score
$0.0248
Cost / run

Mistral Medium 3.1 on each Executive Assistant sub-task

Tactful Rewrite Test 82.0/100 #22
Priority Triage Test 76.7/100 #39
Message Risk Review 69.7/100 #48
Useful in Five Minutes 64.3/100 #48

Real examples, graded

WeakDefensive client email 62/100

“The model accurately identifies the risks in the original draft but fails to execute a commercially sound rewrite. By retaining 'As we mentioned in the proposal', it repeats the original draft's passive-aggressive mistake. It also fails the one-sentence constraint for the strategy.”

← Full Mistral Medium 3.1 review All Executive Assistant rankings → Top pick: claude-opus-4.5-high →

Frequently asked

Is Mistral Medium 3.1 good at Executive Assistant?

Mistral Medium 3.1 ranks #44 of 50 models we tested for Executive Assistant, scoring usable.

What is Mistral Medium 3.1's strongest Executive Assistant skill?

Its best sub-task here is Tactful Rewrite Test.

This page is Spring Prompt, running

We just did this for every model. Do it for your prompt.

The rankings above come from running real tasks through real models and scoring every output. Spring Prompt is that same engine — pointed at your prompt, your test cases, and your definition of good.

  • Generate test cases from your prompt — no eval set required to start.
  • Compare models side by side with quality, cost and latency in one matrix.
  • Optimise the winner until the scores say it's ready to ship.
Experiment · Cold outreach email

Prompt × model results

12 test cases · 3 evals
Claude Opus
GPT-5
Gemini
v1
7.1
6.8
7.4
v2
8.3
7.9
8.0
v3
9.2
8.6
8.4
Best combo: v3 × Claude Opus
9.2 quality · $0.004/run · 1.8s