Confirm Action

Are you sure you want to proceed?

Is Mistral Medium 3.1 good at Frontend & Landing Pages?

Mistral Medium 3.1 ranks #24 of 93 for Frontend & Landing Pages — needs editing. The top pick for this task is gemini-3-flash-preview-max.

#24 / 93
Rank for this task
64.7
Score
$0.0064
Cost / run

Mistral Medium 3.1 on each Frontend & Landing Pages sub-task

Pricing Page Build 72.0/100 #17
Landing Page Build 61.0/100 #47

Real examples, graded

WinGlow & Grain — local bakery site (non-tech) 76/100

“Desktop design is warm and appropriate with clever CSS art, but the mobile header is broken and overflows horizontally. Copy is excellent, perfectly capturing the local bakery tone and utilizing all verified facts without any fabrication.”

← Full Mistral Medium 3.1 review All Frontend & Landing Pages rankings → Top pick: gemini-3-flash-preview-max →

Frequently asked

Is Mistral Medium 3.1 good at Frontend & Landing Pages?

Mistral Medium 3.1 ranks #24 of 93 models we tested for Frontend & Landing Pages, scoring needs editing.

What is Mistral Medium 3.1's strongest Frontend & Landing Pages skill?

Its best sub-task here is Pricing Page Build.

This page is Spring Prompt, running

We just did this for every model. Do it for your prompt.

The rankings above come from running real tasks through real models and scoring every output. Spring Prompt is that same engine — pointed at your prompt, your test cases, and your definition of good.

  • Generate test cases from your prompt — no eval set required to start.
  • Compare models side by side with quality, cost and latency in one matrix.
  • Optimise the winner until the scores say it's ready to ship.
Experiment · Cold outreach email

Prompt × model results

12 test cases · 3 evals
Claude Opus
GPT-5
Gemini
v1
7.1
6.8
7.4
v2
8.3
7.9
8.0
v3
9.2
8.6
8.4
Best combo: v3 × Claude Opus
9.2 quality · $0.004/run · 1.8s