Models / Mistral Nemo

Mistral

Mistral Nemo

19 published results from 2 sources. Each card shows where the number comes from and what it does not measure. Results are never combined into one score.

Provider
Mistral
Sources
2
Our benchmarks
0
Price
Not yet published

Reported by others

Reported by Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4
61.8%
Irrelevance detection · rank 92 of 109
Unit
% correct, higher is better
Configuration
Mistral Nemo (bfcl fc)
Measured
16 Dec 2025
Not shown
Not general refusal or safety behaviour.
Reported by Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4
6.3%
Irrelevance detection · rank 109 of 109
Unit
% correct, higher is better
Configuration
Mistral Nemo (bfcl prompt)
Measured
16 Dec 2025
Not shown
Not general refusal or safety behaviour.
Reported by Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4
10.3%
Memory · rank 72 of 109
Unit
% correct, higher is better
Configuration
Mistral Nemo (bfcl fc)
Measured
16 Dec 2025
Not shown
Not long-term personal memory in a product: sessions are BFCL's scripted ones.
Reported by Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4
8.6%
Memory · rank 75 of 109
Unit
% correct, higher is better
Configuration
Mistral Nemo (bfcl prompt)
Measured
16 Dec 2025
Not shown
Not long-term personal memory in a product: sessions are BFCL's scripted ones.
Reported by Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4
7.8%
Multi-turn tasks · rank 74 of 109
Unit
% correct, higher is better
Configuration
Mistral Nemo (bfcl fc)
Measured
16 Dec 2025
Not shown
Not open-ended agent work: the tools and tasks are BFCL's simulated APIs.
Reported by Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4
0.8%
Multi-turn tasks · rank 101 of 109
Unit
% correct, higher is better
Configuration
Mistral Nemo (bfcl prompt)
Measured
16 Dec 2025
Not shown
Not open-ended agent work: the tools and tasks are BFCL's simulated APIs.
Reported by Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4
27.6%
Overall accuracy · rank 78 of 109
Unit
% correct, higher is better
Configuration
Mistral Nemo (bfcl fc)
Measured
16 Dec 2025
Not shown
Not a neutral average: the weighting is BFCL's. Not reliability on your own tools: BFCL's functions and queries are a fixed test set, and a correct call is judged by its form, not by what it achieved.
Reported by Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4
19.3%
Overall accuracy · rank 102 of 109
Unit
% correct, higher is better
Configuration
Mistral Nemo (bfcl prompt)
Measured
16 Dec 2025
Not shown
Not a neutral average: the weighting is BFCL's. Not reliability on your own tools: BFCL's functions and queries are a fixed test set, and a correct call is judged by its form, not by what it achieved.
Reported by Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4
81.2%
Relevance detection · rank 41 of 109
Unit
% correct, higher is better
Configuration
Mistral Nemo (bfcl fc)
Measured
16 Dec 2025
Not shown
Not whether the call itself was right; only that one was attempted.
Reported by Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4
93.8%
Relevance detection · rank 8 of 109
Unit
% correct, higher is better
Configuration
Mistral Nemo (bfcl prompt)
Measured
16 Dec 2025
Not shown
Not whether the call itself was right; only that one was attempted.
Reported by Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4
82.8%
Single-turn calls (curated) · rank 59 of 109
Unit
% correct, higher is better
Configuration
Mistral Nemo (bfcl fc)
Measured
16 Dec 2025
Not shown
Not reliability on your own tools: BFCL's functions and queries are a fixed test set, and a correct call is judged by its form, not by what it achieved.
Reported by Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4
88.5%
Single-turn calls (curated) · rank 17 of 109
Unit
% correct, higher is better
Configuration
Mistral Nemo (bfcl prompt)
Measured
16 Dec 2025
Not shown
Not reliability on your own tools: BFCL's functions and queries are a fixed test set, and a correct call is judged by its form, not by what it achieved.
Reported by Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4
73.8%
Single-turn calls (user-contributed) · rank 48 of 109
Unit
% correct, higher is better
Configuration
Mistral Nemo (bfcl fc)
Measured
16 Dec 2025
Not shown
Not reliability on your own tools: BFCL's functions and queries are a fixed test set, and a correct call is judged by its form, not by what it achieved.
Reported by Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4
74.0%
Single-turn calls (user-contributed) · rank 47 of 109
Unit
% correct, higher is better
Configuration
Mistral Nemo (bfcl prompt)
Measured
16 Dec 2025
Not shown
Not reliability on your own tools: BFCL's functions and queries are a fixed test set, and a correct call is judged by its form, not by what it achieved.
Reported by Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4
7.0%
Web search · rank 61 of 109
Unit
% correct, higher is better
Configuration
Mistral Nemo (bfcl fc)
Measured
16 Dec 2025
Not shown
Not general research quality: questions have short, checkable answers.
Reported by Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4
2.5%
Web search · rank 71 of 109
Unit
% correct, higher is better
Configuration
Mistral Nemo (bfcl prompt)
Measured
16 Dec 2025
Not shown
Not general research quality: questions have short, checkable answers.
Reported by UGI Leaderboard
18.0%
Requested-length error · rank 150 of 370
Unit
% off the requested word count, lower is better
Configuration
Mistral Nemo
Measured
6 Sep 2025
Not shown
Not other format limits such as character counts or bullet counts.
Reported by UGI Leaderboard
0.34
Style adherence · rank 232 of 370
Unit
score from 0 to 1, higher is better
Configuration
Mistral Nemo
Measured
6 Sep 2025
Not shown
Not brand voice on your own examples: UGI's prompts are private and lean towards creative writing.
Reported by UGI Leaderboard
33.1
Writing score · rank 248 of 370
Unit
score out of 100, higher is better
Configuration
Mistral Nemo
Measured
6 Sep 2025
Not shown
Not business copy quality: UGI's prompts are private and lean towards creative writing, and models that often refuse get no score.

Compare Mistral Nemo with