Is qwen3.5-plus-02-15-max good at Coding?
qwen3.5-plus-02-15-max ranks #25 of 52 for Coding — strong. The top pick for this task is claude-opus-4.8-medium.
qwen3.5-plus-02-15-max on each Coding sub-task
| Secure Implementation | 99.5/100 | #10 |
| Code Review & Security | 98.7/100 | #33 |
| Code Quality and Testing Test | 82.8/100 | #23 |
| Refactoring | 66.7/100 | #46 |
| API and Data Code Test | 60.4/100 | #39 |
Real examples, graded
WinRace condition in a job worker (Northwind) 100/100
“The model perfectly identifies the high-severity concurrency bug, provides an industry-standard fix that minimizes lock contention, and includes excellent operational considerations like idempotency.”
WeakFastAPI endpoint validation 57/100
“The model correctly implements the Pydantic schema with all required validations. However, it catches a generic Exception to handle the 409 duplicate invite, which is a bad practice that masks other errors. It also completely fails to provide the requested brief explanation of its reasoning.”
Frequently asked
Is qwen3.5-plus-02-15-max good at Coding?
qwen3.5-plus-02-15-max ranks #25 of 52 models we tested for Coding, scoring strong.
What is qwen3.5-plus-02-15-max's strongest Coding skill?
Its best sub-task here is Secure Implementation.
This page is Spring Prompt, running
We just did this for every model. Do it for your prompt.
The rankings above come from running real tasks through real models and scoring every output. Spring Prompt is that same engine — pointed at your prompt, your test cases, and your definition of good.
- Generate test cases from your prompt — no eval set required to start.
- Compare models side by side with quality, cost and latency in one matrix.
- Optimise the winner until the scores say it's ready to ship.
Prompt × model results
12 test cases · 3 evals