Confirm Action

Are you sure you want to proceed?

700 AI-generated landing pages, judged

Same brief, different model, real output. Each page was generated as HTML, rendered on desktop and mobile, and graded by a vision judge. Nothing is mocked up — click any card to see the render and what the judge said.

See the full ranking on the Frontend & Landing Pages leaderboard.

Filtered renders (96 renders · page 1 of 2 · highest score first)

Select exactly two models to see them side by side.

Ferrovia — enterprise pricing tiers · Usable
Ferrovia — enterprise pricing tiers · Usable
Tradewinds — marketplace pricing · Usable
Lumen Health — compliance-careful healthtech · Usable
Ferrovia — enterprise pricing tiers · Usable
Cedar & Sage — DTC product page · Usable
Lumen Health — compliance-careful healthtech · Usable
Cedar & Sage — DTC product page · Usable
Ferrovia — enterprise pricing tiers · Usable
Tradewinds — marketplace pricing · Usable
Tradewinds — marketplace pricing · Usable
Northwind — B2B SaaS landing page · Usable
Cedar & Sage — DTC product page · Usable
Glow & Grain — local bakery site (non-tech) · Usable
Lumen Health — compliance-careful healthtech · Usable
Cedar & Sage — DTC product page · Usable
Glow & Grain — local bakery site (non-tech) · Usable
Lumen Health — compliance-careful healthtech · Usable
Tradewinds — marketplace pricing · Usable
Northwind — B2B SaaS landing page · Usable
Cedar & Sage — DTC product page · Usable
Northwind — B2B SaaS landing page · Usable
Northwind — B2B SaaS landing page · Usable
Northwind — B2B SaaS landing page · Usable
Cedar & Sage — DTC product page · Usable
Glow & Grain — local bakery site (non-tech) · Usable
Lumen Health — compliance-careful healthtech · Usable
Lumen Health — compliance-careful healthtech · Usable
Lumen Health — compliance-careful healthtech · Usable
Lumen Health — compliance-careful healthtech · Usable
Ferrovia — enterprise pricing tiers · Usable
Ferrovia — enterprise pricing tiers · Usable
Tradewinds — marketplace pricing · Usable
Lumen Health — compliance-careful healthtech · Usable
Ferrovia — enterprise pricing tiers · Usable
Tradewinds — marketplace pricing · Usable
Cedar & Sage — DTC product page · Usable
Ferrovia — enterprise pricing tiers · Usable
Cedar & Sage — DTC product page · Usable
Cedar & Sage — DTC product page · Usable
Glow & Grain — local bakery site (non-tech) · Usable
Lumen Health — compliance-careful healthtech · Usable
Ferrovia — enterprise pricing tiers · Usable
Tradewinds — marketplace pricing · Needs editing
Lumen Health — compliance-careful healthtech · Needs editing
Ferrovia — enterprise pricing tiers · Needs editing
Northwind — B2B SaaS landing page · Weak
Glow & Grain — local bakery site (non-tech) · Weak
Page 1 / 2 Next →

How these were made and judged

Each model received the same landing-page brief (a fictional company from our shared benchmark universe) and produced a single self-contained HTML page. We rendered every page at desktop and mobile sizes and had a vision judge grade the screenshots against the brief — hierarchy, copy, credibility, and conversion basics. Scores and judge quotes are unedited. Full methodology on the collection page.

This page is Spring Prompt, running

We just did this for every model. Do it for your prompt.

The rankings above come from running real tasks through real models and scoring every output. Spring Prompt is that same engine — pointed at your prompt, your test cases, and your definition of good.

  • Generate test cases from your prompt — no eval set required to start.
  • Compare models side by side with quality, cost and latency in one matrix.
  • Optimise the winner until the scores say it's ready to ship.
Experiment · Cold outreach email

Prompt × model results

12 test cases · 3 evals
Claude Opus
GPT-5
Gemini
v1
7.1
6.8
7.4
v2
8.3
7.9
8.0
v3
9.2
8.6
8.4
Best combo: v3 × Claude Opus
9.2 quality · $0.004/run · 1.8s