Qwen · mid
Is Qwen3.7 Max good?
Qwen3.7 Max places top-3 in 8 of 22 task areas we tested. It's strongest at content & brand and weakest at creative & comedy. It's a mid-priced option ($5/1M tokens).
Our take
Strengths
Weak spots
How Qwen3.7 Max ranks, task by task
Rank is the position in each field; Rating is the absolute quality bar. A model can be rated "Excellent" yet sit mid-table when the whole field is strong — and vice-versa.
| Task area | Rank | Percentile | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|
| Content & Brand | #1 of 50 |
|
Strong |
| Landing Pages | #1 of 56 |
|
Strong |
| RAG, Safety & Grounding | #1 of 35 |
|
Excellent |
| Structured Output | #1 of 43 |
|
Excellent |
| Translation & Localization | #1 of 44 |
|
Excellent |
| Product & Project Management | #2 of 44 |
|
Excellent |
| Presentations & Decks | #3 of 44 |
|
Excellent |
| Customer Support | #3 of 43 |
|
Strong |
| Data & Analytics | #7 of 69 |
|
Excellent |
| Frontend & Landing Pages | #10 of 93 |
|
Needs editing |
| AI Strategy | #7 of 50 |
|
Strong |
| Coding | #9 of 52 |
|
Strong |
| Investor & Pitch | #10 of 50 |
|
Strong |
| Summarization & Meeting Notes | #9 of 44 |
|
Excellent |
| Sales | #12 of 44 |
|
Strong |
| Knowledge & Docs | #27 of 94 |
|
Strong |
| Executive Assistant | #15 of 50 |
|
Strong |
| Chef / Home Cooking | #20 of 50 |
|
Usable |
| Training & Education | #19 of 44 |
|
Excellent |
| Legal & HR | #23 of 44 |
|
Excellent |
| Research & Competitive Analysis | #29 of 44 |
|
Usable |
| Creative & Comedy | #39 of 44 |
|
Elo |
Industry benchmarks
Standardized third-party scores, shown for context — these are independent of our real-task tests.
Artificial Analysis indices
Design Arena — human preference (avg Elo 1303)
Headline vs. real-world
Qwen3.7 Max punches above its headline benchmarks — it ranks higher on our real-world tasks than its Intelligence Index would suggest.
Source: Artificial Analysis (artificialanalysis.ai) via OpenRouter (openrouter.ai/rankings). (2026-06-29) · Source: Design Arena (www.designarena.ai) via OpenRouter (openrouter.ai/rankings). (2026-06-29)
Like Qwen3.7 Max, but…
Similar
- Claude Opus 4.8 Frontier
- Claude Opus 4.5 Frontier
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Premium
Cheaper
No clear alternative.
Smarter
- GPT-5.5 +5 pts
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview +5 pts
Frequently asked
Is Qwen3.7 Max any good?
Qwen3.7 Max places top-3 in 8 of 22 task areas we benchmarked. It performs best at Content & Brand.
What is Qwen3.7 Max best at?
Its strongest task areas are Content & Brand, Landing Pages, Translation & Localization.
How we test & rank
Each model is scored on real tasks across 22 task areas by an LLM judge with deterministic checks. "Percentile" is this model's standing within each area's field; the cross-area figures are rank-based so quality and Elo scores are never mixed.
This page is Spring Prompt, running
We just did this for every model. Do it for your prompt.
The rankings above come from running real tasks through real models and scoring every output. Spring Prompt is that same engine — pointed at your prompt, your test cases, and your definition of good.
- Generate test cases from your prompt — no eval set required to start.
- Compare models side by side with quality, cost and latency in one matrix.
- Optimise the winner until the scores say it's ready to ship.
Prompt × model results
12 test cases · 3 evals