Compare / Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs Gemini 3 Pro Preview
Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs Gemini 3 Pro Preview
Which is cheaper, which is more capable, and which does better at each kind of work, from 23 results on 4 sources that measured both models.
Of the 23 results both models have, the better value on each. Results whose reported ranges overlap are too close to call.
Results as of 20 October 2026 (catalogue release 2026-10-20-96eb40c3ec63). See also Alibaba vs Google, every model from both labs.
Qwen3.5-397B-A17B or Gemini 3 Pro Preview? The short answer
Pick Gemini 3 Pro Preview: it scores higher (Intelligence Index 28.0 against 21.4) at about the same price.
- Gemini 3 Pro Preview scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index: 28.0 against 21.4.
- Qwen3.5-397B-A17B is newer: released 13 Feb 2026, against 18 Nov 2025 for Gemini 3 Pro Preview.
- On third-party benchmarks, on the results both models have: Qwen3.5-397B-A17B does better for agents and tool use; Gemini 3 Pro Preview for reasoning and knowledge, writing and sticking to the facts.
Head to head
Every fact side by side
| Qwen3.5-397B-A17B | Gemini 3 Pro Preview | |
|---|---|---|
| Price per million tokens | $0.55 in · $3.50 out | Not on sale |
| Blended (3 in : 1 out) | $1.29 | – |
| Cheapest host, blended | $0.88 (Alibaba) | – |
| Intelligence Index | 21.4 | 28.0 |
| Spring Prompt overall | – | – |
| Output speed, tokens a second | 56 | – |
| Context window | 262,144 tokens | – |
| Released | 13 Feb 2026 (newer) | 18 Nov 2025 |
| Weights | Open | Closed |
| Developer based in | China | the US |
Prices are the developer's list price where we have read it, otherwise the typical host on OpenRouter; see every model's price. Intelligence and speed from Artificial Analysis.
Which is better for what
Each model's rank among the models on sale today, for each kind of work, from our own benchmarks and licensed sources. Further right is better; the better rank is in green.
From our research
Every shared result
Each model's best result on every measure both have, grouped by benchmark, with the setting that produced it. Under each measure, every model that benchmark has measured is a grey tick, best to the right, so you can see where the two sit in the field. The headline measures of each benchmark come first; the rest are under "Show all". Green marks the better value; where a source reports ranges that overlap, neither is marked.
| Measure | Qwen3.5-397B-A17B | Gemini 3 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Arena (formerly LMArena) reported by Arena (formerly LMArena) · 3 results | ||
| Overall · TextArena rating, higher is better 80 · 16 of 387 measured | 1,442 | 1,485 |
| Overall · Text factualityArena rating, higher is better 70 · 11 of 163 measured | 1,445 | 1,481 |
| Business, management and finance · TextArena rating, higher is better 73 · 28 of 380 measured | 1,446 | 1,474 |
| Artificial Analysis reported by Artificial Analysis · 3 results | ||
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score, higher is better 103 · 63 of 249 measured | 21.4no reasoning | 28.0high reasoning |
| GPQA Diamond% of questions, higher is better 53 · 35 of 232 measured | 89.3% | 90.8%high reasoning |
| Humanity's Last Exam% of questions, higher is better 83 · 46 of 248 measured | 29.0% | 39.7%high reasoning |
| τ²-bench reported by τ²-bench · 3 results | ||
| Task success (pass^1) · tau2 v1.0.1, airline% of tasks, higher is better 5 · 6 of 7 measured | 81.5%thinking reasoning, tau2 | 80.5%high reasoning, tau2 |
| Task success (pass^1) · tau2 v1.0.1, retail% of tasks, higher is better 1 · 5 of 7 measured | 84.4%thinking reasoning, tau2 | 75.9%high reasoning, tau2 |
| Task success (pass^1) · tau2 v1.0.1, telecom% of tasks, higher is better 1 · 4 of 7 measured | 97.8%thinking reasoning, tau2 | 91.0%high reasoning, tau2 |
| UGI Leaderboard reported by UGI Leaderboard · 3 results | ||
| Writing score · UGIscore out of 100, higher is better 77 · 25 of 230 measured | 50.1no reasoning | 66.7high reasoning |
| Requested-length error · UGI% off the requested word count, lower is better 134 · 176 of 230 measured | 23.0%no reasoning | 33.0%low reasoning |
| Style adherence · UGIscore from 0 to 1, higher is better 164 · 49 of 230 measured | 0.33no reasoning | 0.37high reasoning |
Show all 23 results (11 more)
| Measure | Qwen3.5-397B-A17B | Gemini 3 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Arena (formerly LMArena) reported by Arena (formerly LMArena) · 4 results | ||
| Creative writing · TextArena rating, higher is better 86 · 8 of 385 measured | 1,405 | 1,484 |
| Expert prompts · TextArena rating, higher is better 67 · 39 of 338 measured | 1,477 | 1,498 |
| Instruction following · TextArena rating, higher is better 78 · 26 of 387 measured | 1,434 | 1,473 |
| Writing, literature and language · TextArena rating, higher is better 80 · 10 of 386 measured | 1,421 | 1,481 |
| Artificial Analysis reported by Artificial Analysis · 4 results | ||
| IFBench% of instructions, higher is better 8 · 52 of 195 measured | 78.8% | 70.4%high reasoning |
| Long-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions, higher is better 71 · 78 of 239 measured | 77.3% | 76.0%high reasoning |
| Terminal-Bench Hard% of tasks, higher is better 34 · 32 of 190 measured | 40.9% | 41.7%high reasoning |
| τ²-bench telecom% of tasks, higher is better 16 · 49 of 193 measured | 95.6% | 87.1%high reasoning |
| τ²-bench reported by τ²-bench · 3 results | ||
| Consistency (pass^4) · tau2 v1.0.1, airline% of tasks, higher is better 4 · 6 of 7 measured | 68.0%thinking reasoning, tau2 | 66.0%high reasoning, tau2 |
| Consistency (pass^4) · tau2 v1.0.1, retail% of tasks, higher is better 1 · 5 of 7 measured | 59.7%thinking reasoning, tau2 | 47.4%high reasoning, tau2 |
| Consistency (pass^4) · tau2 v1.0.1, telecom% of tasks, higher is better 1 · 3 of 7 measured | 92.1%thinking reasoning, tau2 | 74.6%high reasoning, tau2 |
Compare them with other models
Quick answers
Is Qwen3.5-397B-A17B better than Gemini 3 Pro Preview?
Pick Gemini 3 Pro Preview: it scores higher (Intelligence Index 28.0 against 21.4) at about the same price.
Which is better for agents and tool use, Qwen3.5-397B-A17B or Gemini 3 Pro Preview?
Qwen3.5-397B-A17B ranks 71 of 168 models on sale for multi-step tasks with tools: support desks, coding agents, function calls, against 79 for Gemini 3 Pro Preview.
Which is better for professional work, Qwen3.5-397B-A17B or Gemini 3 Pro Preview?
Gemini 3 Pro Preview ranks 45 of 51 models on sale for real tasks from banking, consulting and law, business documents and freelance projects, against 48 for Qwen3.5-397B-A17B.
Which is better for reasoning and knowledge, Qwen3.5-397B-A17B or Gemini 3 Pro Preview?
Gemini 3 Pro Preview ranks 48 of 202 models on sale for hard questions across science, maths and general knowledge, against 77 for Qwen3.5-397B-A17B.
Which is better for writing, Qwen3.5-397B-A17B or Gemini 3 Pro Preview?
Gemini 3 Pro Preview ranks 21 of 189 models on sale for what people prefer in blind comparisons, and judged writing quality, against 70 for Qwen3.5-397B-A17B.
Which is better for sticking to the facts, Qwen3.5-397B-A17B or Gemini 3 Pro Preview?
Gemini 3 Pro Preview ranks 69 of 153 models on sale for summarising without inventing things, and factual answers, against 76 for Qwen3.5-397B-A17B.
Run Qwen3.5-397B-A17B and Gemini 3 Pro Preview on your own prompt
Benchmarks aren't your data. Try both side by side in the playground, with the cost of every answer.