Compare / Anthropic vs Moonshot AI
Anthropic vs Moonshot AI: which AI lab is ahead?
Each lab's best model on sale goes head to head on every kind of work we measure, from our own benchmarks and licensed sources. 23 models in all; a lab is only as good as the model you would actually pick from it.
Kinds of work led by each lab's best model there, of the 9 both are measured on.
Results as of 8 October 2026 (catalogue release 2026-10-08-4199ce0620fe). Models on sale means listed on OpenRouter today.
Anthropic or Moonshot AI? The short answer
Anthropic is ahead: its best models beat Moonshot AI's in all 9 kinds of work both are measured on.
- Pick Anthropic for product listings, decks from an analysis, marketing planning, agents and tool use, professional work, reasoning and knowledge, writing, sticking to the facts and speed under pressure.
- On our overall leaderboard, Claude Opus 5.5 is #1 (85 of 100) and Kimi K3 is #10 (50).
- Prices start at $0.20 per million tokens for Anthropic (Claude Haiku 5.5) and $1.00 for Moonshot AI (Kimi K2 (0711)).
Head to head
Each line names the model behind the number. Prices are blended, three input tokens to one output, at the developer's list price where we have read it; see every model's price. Intelligence Index from Artificial Analysis; overall score from our leaderboard.
Which lab is better for what
For each kind of work, each lab's best model there and its rank among every model on sale. Further right is better; the better rank is in green.
Every model, by intelligence and price
Each dot is a model on sale with an Intelligence Index from Artificial Analysis. Up is smarter; left is cheaper. Hover or tap a dot for its name.
AnthropicMoonshot AI
On our overall leaderboard
The 6 of their models we rank overall: one score out of 100 across everything we publish (how the score works). Only models with enough of our own results are ranked.
- #1Claude Opus 5.585
- #5Claude Fable 5.166
- #7Claude Sonnet 5.564
- #10Kimi K350
- #13Claude Haiku 5.544
- #22Claude Haiku 4.57
Benchmark by benchmark
The headline result of every benchmark both labs have models on: each lab's best model and its rank among the models on sale. Green marks the better rank.
| Measure | Anthropic | Moonshot AI |
|---|---|---|
| Agents and tool use | ||
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4 · Overall accuracy · BFCL% correct, higher is better | 77.5%Claude Opus 4.5 · 1 of 38 | 59.1%Kimi K2 (0711) · 6 of 38 |
| OpenHands Index · Average% resolved, higher is better | 81.0%Claude Fable 5 · 1 of 33 | 57.1%Kimi K2.6 · 14 of 33 |
| Microsoft STATE-Bench · Task success (pass@1) · STATE-Bench v0.7% of tasks, higher is better | 53.4%Claude Opus 4.7 · 2 of 4 | 48.3%Kimi K2.6 · 3 of 4 |
| Artificial Analysis · Terminal-Bench 4.0% of tasks, higher is better | 63.6%Claude Sonnet 5.5 · 1 of 105 | 12.6%Kimi K3 · 29 of 105 |
| Artificial Analysis · Terminal-Bench 2.1% of tasks, higher is better | 91.4%Claude Fable 5.1 · 1 of 115 | 85.0%Kimi K3 · 11 of 115 |
| Artificial Analysis · τ-bench banking% of tasks, higher is better | 47.2%Claude Fable 5.1 · 7 of 113 | 46.0%Kimi K3 · 9 of 113 |
| Vending-Bench 2 · Money after a yearUS dollars, higher is better | $11,182Claude Opus 5 · 3 of 56 | $6,205Kimi K2.6 · 15 of 56 |
| Decks from an analysis | ||
| DeckBench · Deck ratingrating, higher is better | 1,352Claude Sonnet 5.5 · 4 of 19 | 1,229Kimi K3 · 8 of 19 |
| Marketing planning | ||
| ROASBench · Overall scorescore out of 100, higher is better | 52.0Claude Sonnet 5.5 · 4 of 19 | 44.1Kimi K3 · 8 of 19 |
| Product listings | ||
| CatalogBench · Reliably publish-ready% of products, higher is better | 55.4%Claude Opus 5.5 · 5 of 20 | 41.1%Kimi K3 · 9 of 20 |
| CatalogBench · Reliably publish-ready · sales brief% of products, higher is better | 21.4%Claude Opus 5.5 · 7 of 20 | 1.8%Kimi K3 · 16 of 20 |
| Professional work | ||
| APEX-Agents · Tasks passed% of tasks, higher is better | 75.5%Claude Sonnet 5.5 · 1 of 37 | 50.6%Kimi K3 · 21 of 37 |
| GDP.pdf · Professional document tasks% of rubric, higher is better | 30.6%Claude Opus 5.5 · 2 of 31 | 19.0%Kimi K3 · 17 of 31 |
| Reasoning and knowledge | ||
| Artificial Analysis · Artificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score, higher is better | 57.6Claude Opus 5.5 · 1 of 198 | 43.6Kimi K3 · 16 of 198 |
| Artificial Analysis · Humanity's Last Exam% of questions, higher is better | 61.4%Claude Opus 5.5 · 1 of 197 | 46.9%Kimi K3 · 16 of 197 |
| Artificial Analysis · GPQA Diamond% of questions, higher is better | 93.7%Claude Fable 5.1 · 8 of 187 | 93.5%Kimi K3 · 10 of 187 |
| Speed under pressure | ||
| BulletBench · Ladder Elo · Bullet 60sladder Elo, higher is better | 445Claude Haiku 4.5 · 10 of 20 | 33Kimi K3 · 17 of 20 |
| Sticking to the facts | ||
| Vectara Hallucination Leaderboard · Hallucination rate · Vectara% of summaries, lower is better | 9.8%Claude Haiku 4.5 · 43 of 79 | 10.8%Kimi K2.6 · 52 of 79 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena) · Overall · Text factualityArena rating, higher is better | 1,507Claude Opus 5.5 · 1 of 113 | 1,472Kimi K3 · 16 of 113 |
| SimpleQA Verified (Epoch AI) · Correct answers% of questions, higher is better | 72.2%Claude Opus 5.5 · 4 of 73 | 50.6%Kimi K3 · 23 of 73 |
| Writing | ||
| Arena (formerly LMArena) · Overall · TextArena rating, higher is better | 1,505Claude Opus 4.6 · 1 of 166 | 1,488Kimi K3 · 11 of 166 |
| UGI Leaderboard · Writing score · UGIscore out of 100, higher is better | 74.2Claude Fable 5 · 3 of 138 | 64.4Kimi K2.6 · 25 of 138 |
Their models, one against one
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs Kimi K3Benchmarks, price and which to pick
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Kimi K3Benchmarks, price and which to pick
- Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Kimi K3Benchmarks, price and which to pick
- Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Kimi K3Benchmarks, price and which to pick
- Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Kimi K3Benchmarks, price and which to pick
Quick answers
Is Anthropic or Moonshot AI better?
Anthropic is ahead: its best models beat Moonshot AI's in all 9 kinds of work both are measured on.
What is Anthropic's best model?
Claude Opus 5.5: #1 on the Spring Prompt overall leaderboard and 57.6 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.
What is Moonshot AI's best model?
Kimi K3: #10 on the Spring Prompt overall leaderboard and 43.6 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.
Which is better for agents and tool use, Anthropic or Moonshot AI?
Anthropic: its best model there, Claude Sonnet 5.5, ranks 1 of 164 models on sale, against 19 for Moonshot AI's Kimi K2 (0711).
Which is better for reasoning and knowledge, Anthropic or Moonshot AI?
Anthropic: its best model there, Claude Opus 5.5, ranks 1 of 198 models on sale, against 15 for Moonshot AI's Kimi K3.
Which is better for writing, Anthropic or Moonshot AI?
Anthropic: its best model there, Claude Fable 5, ranks 1 of 188 models on sale, against 11 for Moonshot AI's Kimi K3.
Which is cheaper, Anthropic or Moonshot AI?
Anthropic's cheapest model with results, Claude Haiku 5.5, costs $0.20 per million tokens (three input to one output), against $1.00 for Kimi K2 (0711) from Moonshot AI.
Other labs compared
- Anthropic vs OpenAIBest model against best model
- Anthropic vs GoogleBest model against best model
- Anthropic vs xAIBest model against best model
- Anthropic vs MetaBest model against best model
- Anthropic vs DeepSeekBest model against best model
- Alibaba vs AnthropicBest model against best model
- Anthropic vs Mistral AIBest model against best model
- Anthropic vs Z.aiBest model against best model
Which model is best for your product?
Benchmarks aren't your data. We test the models from Anthropic, Moonshot AI and the rest on your own tasks, with the cost of every answer.