Confirm Action

Are you sure you want to proceed?

Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.6 VS Anthropic Claude Sonnet 5

Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Claude Sonnet 5: which wins at real work?

22 task areas · same graded test runs · rank comparison only, so 0–100 and Elo collections never mix raw scores.

Claude Sonnet 4.6 wins 15 of 22 task areas we tested; Claude Sonnet 5 takes 7. Claude Sonnet 5 costs 1.5× less per token ($12 vs $18 per 1M).

15
Task areas won
7
76
Avg percentile
60
4
Top-3 finishes
1
$18.0
Price / 1M tokens
$12.0
Anthropic
Provider
Anthropic

Claude Sonnet 5 costs 1.5× less per token ($12 vs $18 per 1M).

Task by task

Task area Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 5 Winner
Summarization & Meeting Notes #34 / 107
Excellent
#105 / 107
Excellent
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Executive Assistant #1 / 109
Strong
#66 / 109
Strong
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Creative & Comedy #18 / 107 #76 / 107 Claude Sonnet 4.6
Legal & HR #3 / 107
Excellent
#55 / 107
Excellent
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Training & Education #9 / 107
Excellent
#49 / 107
Excellent
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Frontend & Landing Pages #20 / 106
Needs editing
#54 / 106
Needs editing
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Structured Output #98 / 110
Usable
#64 / 110
Strong
Claude Sonnet 5
Investor & Pitch #2 / 63
Strong
#34 / 63
Usable
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Content & Brand #38 / 124
Strong
#68 / 124
Strong
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Translation & Localization #13 / 107
Excellent
#40 / 107
Excellent
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Coding #25 / 115
Strong
#6 / 115
Excellent
Claude Sonnet 5
Research & Competitive Analysis #33 / 107
Strong
#15 / 107
Excellent
Claude Sonnet 5
Knowledge & Docs #34 / 107
Strong
#18 / 107
Strong
Claude Sonnet 5
Presentations & Decks #33 / 107
Excellent
#20 / 107
Excellent
Claude Sonnet 5
RAG, Safety & Grounding #65 / 110
Excellent
#77 / 110
Excellent
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Product & Project Management #48 / 107
Strong
#59 / 107
Strong
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Data & Analytics #6 / 110
Excellent
#15 / 110
Excellent
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Landing Pages #14 / 69
Strong
#23 / 69
Strong
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Chef / Home Cooking #19 / 126
Usable
#27 / 126
Usable
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Customer Support #57 / 113
Strong
#52 / 113
Strong
Claude Sonnet 5
Sales #13 / 107
Strong
#15 / 107
Strong
Claude Sonnet 4.6
AI Strategy #2 / 126
Strong
#1 / 126
Strong
Claude Sonnet 5

Rank = position among every model config we tested in that task area (lower is better). Sorted by biggest gap first.

Frequently asked

Is Claude Sonnet 4.6 better than Claude Sonnet 5?

Across 22 task areas we benchmarked, Claude Sonnet 4.6 ranks higher in 15 and Claude Sonnet 5 in 7.

Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 4.6 or Claude Sonnet 5?

Claude Sonnet 5 costs 1.5× less per token ($12 vs $18 per 1M).

What is Claude Sonnet 4.6 better at?

Claude Sonnet 4.6 out-ranks Claude Sonnet 5 at Summarization & Meeting Notes, Executive Assistant, Creative & Comedy.

What is Claude Sonnet 5 better at?

Claude Sonnet 5 out-ranks Claude Sonnet 4.6 at Structured Output, Coding, Research & Competitive Analysis.

Full Claude Sonnet 4.6 review → Full Claude Sonnet 5 review → Full model leaderboard →

This page is Spring Prompt, running

We just did this for every model. Do it for your prompt.

The rankings above come from running real tasks through real models and scoring every output. Spring Prompt is that same engine — pointed at your prompt, your test cases, and your definition of good.

  • Generate test cases from your prompt — no eval set required to start.
  • Compare models side by side with quality, cost and latency in one matrix.
  • Optimise the winner until the scores say it's ready to ship.
Experiment · Cold outreach email

Prompt × model results

12 test cases · 3 evals
Claude Opus
GPT-5
Gemini
v1
7.1
6.8
7.4
v2
8.3
7.9
8.0
v3
9.2
8.6
8.4
Best combo: v3 × Claude Opus
9.2 quality · $0.004/run · 1.8s