Compare / Google vs Moonshot AI
Google vs Moonshot AI: which AI lab is ahead?
Each lab's best model on sale goes head to head on every kind of work we measure, from our own benchmarks and licensed sources. 23 models in all; a lab is only as good as the model you would actually pick from it.
Kinds of work led by each lab's best model there, of the 9 both are measured on.
Results as of 8 October 2026 (catalogue release 2026-10-08-4199ce0620fe). Models on sale means listed on OpenRouter today.
Google or Moonshot AI? The short answer
Google is ahead: its best models beat Moonshot AI's in 7 of the 9 kinds of work both are measured on; Moonshot AI leads in 2.
- Pick Google for product listings, marketing planning, professional work, reasoning and knowledge, writing, sticking to the facts and speed under pressure.
- Pick Moonshot AI for decks from an analysis and agents and tool use.
- On our overall leaderboard, Gemini 3.8 Flash is #8 (61 of 100) and Kimi K3 is #10 (50).
- Prices start at $0.062 per million tokens for Google (Gemma 3 4B) and $1.00 for Moonshot AI (Kimi K2 (0711)).
Head to head
Each line names the model behind the number. Prices are blended, three input tokens to one output, at the developer's list price where we have read it; see every model's price. Intelligence Index from Artificial Analysis; overall score from our leaderboard.
Which lab is better for what
For each kind of work, each lab's best model there and its rank among every model on sale. Further right is better; the better rank is in green.
Every model, by intelligence and price
Each dot is a model on sale with an Intelligence Index from Artificial Analysis. Up is smarter; left is cheaper. Hover or tap a dot for its name.
GoogleMoonshot AI
On our overall leaderboard
The 4 of their models we rank overall: one score out of 100 across everything we publish (how the score works). Only models with enough of our own results are ranked.
- #8Gemini 3.8 Flash61
- #10Kimi K350
- #10Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview50
- #19Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite27
Benchmark by benchmark
The headline result of every benchmark both labs have models on: each lab's best model and its rank among the models on sale. Green marks the better rank.
| Measure | Moonshot AI | |
|---|---|---|
| Agents and tool use | ||
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4 · Overall accuracy · BFCL% correct, higher is better | 56.2%Gemini 2.5 Flash · 8 of 38 | 59.1%Kimi K2 (0711) · 6 of 38 |
| OpenHands Index · Average% resolved, higher is better | 62.6%Gemini 3.5 Flash · 7 of 33 | 57.1%Kimi K2.6 · 14 of 33 |
| Artificial Analysis · Terminal-Bench 4.0% of tasks, higher is better | 19.7%Gemini 3.8 Flash · 23 of 105 | 12.6%Kimi K3 · 29 of 105 |
| Artificial Analysis · Terminal-Bench 2.1% of tasks, higher is better | 87.6%Gemini 3.8 Flash · 8 of 115 | 85.0%Kimi K3 · 11 of 115 |
| Artificial Analysis · τ-bench banking% of tasks, higher is better | 45.8%Gemini 3.8 Flash · 10 of 113 | 46.0%Kimi K3 · 9 of 113 |
| Vending-Bench 2 · Money after a yearUS dollars, higher is better | $5,396Gemini 3.5 Flash · 22 of 56 | $6,205Kimi K2.6 · 15 of 56 |
| Decks from an analysis | ||
| DeckBench · Deck ratingrating, higher is better | 894Gemini 3.8 Flash · 12 of 19 | 1,229Kimi K3 · 8 of 19 |
| Marketing planning | ||
| ROASBench · Overall scorescore out of 100, higher is better | 51.4Gemini 3.8 Flash · 7 of 19 | 44.1Kimi K3 · 8 of 19 |
| Product listings | ||
| CatalogBench · Reliably publish-ready% of products, higher is better | 44.6%Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview · 8 of 20 | 41.1%Kimi K3 · 9 of 20 |
| CatalogBench · Reliably publish-ready · sales brief% of products, higher is better | 16.1%Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview · 8 of 20 | 1.8%Kimi K3 · 16 of 20 |
| Professional work | ||
| APEX-Agents · Tasks passed% of tasks, higher is better | 67.8%Gemini 3.7 Flash · 4 of 37 | 50.6%Kimi K3 · 21 of 37 |
| GDP.pdf · Professional document tasks% of rubric, higher is better | 23.8%Gemini 3.7 Flash · 11 of 31 | 19.0%Kimi K3 · 17 of 31 |
| Reasoning and knowledge | ||
| Artificial Analysis · Artificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score, higher is better | 40.9Gemini 3.8 Flash · 21 of 198 | 43.6Kimi K3 · 16 of 198 |
| Artificial Analysis · Humanity's Last Exam% of questions, higher is better | 47.9%Gemini 3.7 Flash · 12 of 197 | 46.9%Kimi K3 · 16 of 197 |
| Artificial Analysis · GPQA Diamond% of questions, higher is better | 95.3%Gemini 3.8 Flash · 2 of 187 | 93.5%Kimi K3 · 10 of 187 |
| Speed under pressure | ||
| BulletBench · Ladder Elo · Bullet 60sladder Elo, higher is better | 1,068Gemini 3.8 Flash · 1 of 20 | 33Kimi K3 · 17 of 20 |
| Sticking to the facts | ||
| Vectara Hallucination Leaderboard · Hallucination rate · Vectara% of summaries, lower is better | 3.3%Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite · 2 of 79 | 10.8%Kimi K2.6 · 52 of 79 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena) · Overall · Text factualityArena rating, higher is better | 1,477Gemini 3.7 Flash · 12 of 113 | 1,472Kimi K3 · 16 of 113 |
| SimpleQA Verified (Epoch AI) · Correct answers% of questions, higher is better | 73.5%Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview · 3 of 73 | 50.6%Kimi K3 · 23 of 73 |
| Writing | ||
| Arena (formerly LMArena) · Overall · TextArena rating, higher is better | 1,495Gemini 3.8 Flash · 6 of 166 | 1,488Kimi K3 · 11 of 166 |
| UGI Leaderboard · Writing score · UGIscore out of 100, higher is better | 78.6Gemini 3.8 Flash · 1 of 138 | 64.4Kimi K2.6 · 25 of 138 |
Their models, one against one
- Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Kimi K3Benchmarks, price and which to pick
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Kimi K3Benchmarks, price and which to pick
- Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs Kimi K3Benchmarks, price and which to pick
- Gemini 3.6 Flash vs Kimi K3Benchmarks, price and which to pick
- Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Kimi K3Benchmarks, price and which to pick
Quick answers
Is Google or Moonshot AI better?
Google is ahead: its best models beat Moonshot AI's in 7 of the 9 kinds of work both are measured on; Moonshot AI leads in 2.
What is Google's best model?
Gemini 3.8 Flash: #8 on the Spring Prompt overall leaderboard and 40.9 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.
What is Moonshot AI's best model?
Kimi K3: #10 on the Spring Prompt overall leaderboard and 43.6 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.
Which is better for agents and tool use, Google or Moonshot AI?
Moonshot AI: its best model there, Kimi K2 (0711), ranks 19 of 164 models on sale, against 29 for Google's Gemini 3.7 Flash.
Which is better for reasoning and knowledge, Google or Moonshot AI?
Google: its best model there, Gemini 3.8 Flash, ranks 12 of 198 models on sale, against 15 for Moonshot AI's Kimi K3.
Which is better for writing, Google or Moonshot AI?
Google: its best model there, Gemini 3.8 Flash, ranks 2 of 188 models on sale, against 11 for Moonshot AI's Kimi K3.
Which is cheaper, Google or Moonshot AI?
Google's cheapest model with results, Gemma 3 4B, costs $0.062 per million tokens (three input to one output), against $1.00 for Kimi K2 (0711) from Moonshot AI.
Other labs compared
- Google vs OpenAIBest model against best model
- Anthropic vs GoogleBest model against best model
- Google vs xAIBest model against best model
- Google vs MetaBest model against best model
- DeepSeek vs GoogleBest model against best model
- Alibaba vs GoogleBest model against best model
- Google vs Mistral AIBest model against best model
- Google vs Z.aiBest model against best model
Which model is best for your product?
Benchmarks aren't your data. We test the models from Google, Moonshot AI and the rest on your own tasks, with the cost of every answer.