Compare / Mistral Small 3.1 24B vs GPT-5.2

Mistral Small 3.1 24B vs GPT-5.2

Which is cheaper, which is more capable, and which does better at each kind of work, from 17 results on 3 sources that measured both models.

Mistral Small 3.1 24B
Mistral · profile
GPT-5.2
OpenAI · profile
Results compared
17
Shared sources
3

Mistral Small 3.1 24B or GPT-5.2? The short answer

  • Mistral Small 3.1 24B is cheaper: $0.40 against $4.81 per million tokens, 12 times less.
  • GPT-5.2 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index: 30.4 against 7.1.
  • On our business benchmarks, GPT-5.2 ranks higher for agents and tool use, reasoning and knowledge and writing.

At a glance

Mistral Small 3.1 24BGPT-5.2
Price per million tokens$0.35 in · $0.56 out$1.75 in · $14.00 out
Blended (3 in : 1 out)$0.40$4.81
Cheapest host, blended–$2.41 (OpenAI)
Intelligence Index7.130.4
Spring Prompt overall––
Output speed, tokens a second––
Context window128,000 tokens400,000 tokens
WeightsOpenClosed
Developer based inFrancethe US

Prices are the developer's list price where we have read it, otherwise the typical host on OpenRouter; see every model's price. Intelligence and speed from Artificial Analysis.

Which is better for what

Each model's rank among models available today, for each kind of work, from our own benchmarks and licensed sources. The better rank is in green.

Use caseMistral Small 3.1 24BGPT-5.2
Agents and tool useMulti-step tasks with tools: support desks, coding agents, function calls 114 of 161 54 of 161
Professional workReal tasks from banking, consulting and law, business documents and freelance projects not measured 33 of 51
Reasoning and knowledgeHard questions across science, maths and general knowledge 172 of 195 46 of 195
WritingWhat people prefer in blind comparisons, and judged writing quality 157 of 187 73 of 187
Sticking to the factsSummarising without inventing things, and factual answers not measured 77 of 153

Every shared result

BenchmarkMetricMistral Small 3.1 24BGPT-5.2
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,2971,444
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,2701,391
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,3021,475
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,2941,427
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,3031,437
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,2901,411
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 7.1030.4
Artificial AnalysisreportedGPQA Diamond% of questions 45.4%90.3%
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 4.3%37.7%
Artificial AnalysisreportedIFBench% of instructions 29.9%75.4%
Artificial AnalysisreportedLong-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions 22.3%82.7%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench Hard% of tasks 7.6%47.0%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ-bench banking% of tasks 7.4%11.1%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ²-bench telecom% of tasks 25.1%84.8%
UGI LeaderboardreportedRequested-length error% off the requested word count 11.0%76.0%
UGI LeaderboardreportedStyle adherencescore from 0 to 1 0.350.40
UGI LeaderboardreportedWriting scorescore out of 100 32.149.4

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.

Quick answers

Is Mistral Small 3.1 24B better than GPT-5.2?

It depends on the task. Among models available today, on our benchmarks and licensed sources, GPT-5.2 ranks higher for agents and tool use, reasoning and knowledge and writing.

Which is cheaper, Mistral Small 3.1 24B or GPT-5.2?

Mistral Small 3.1 24B costs $0.40 per million tokens (three input to one output), against $4.81 for GPT-5.2.

Run Mistral Small 3.1 24B and GPT-5.2 on your own prompt

Benchmarks aren't your data. Try both side by side in the playground, with the cost of every answer.