Is claude-opus-4.5-low good at Translation & Localization?
claude-opus-4.5-low ranks #4 of 44 for Translation & Localization — excellent. The top pick for this task is qwen3.7-max.
#4 / 44
Rank for this task
99.6
Score
$0.0290
Cost / run
claude-opus-4.5-low on each Translation & Localization sub-task
| Catch the Translation Error | 100.0/100 | #4 |
| Register & Formality | 100.0/100 | #13 |
| Localization | 100.0/100 | #4 |
| Business Translation | 98.7/100 | #24 |
Real examples, graded
WeakLocalize a receipt line (en-US → de-DE) 30/100
“The model failed to convert the currency to Euros as required, constituting a major failure.”
Frequently asked
Is claude-opus-4.5-low good at Translation & Localization?
claude-opus-4.5-low ranks #4 of 44 models we tested for Translation & Localization, scoring excellent.
What is claude-opus-4.5-low's strongest Translation & Localization skill?
Its best sub-task here is Catch the Translation Error.
This page is Spring Prompt, running
We just did this for every model. Do it for your prompt.
The rankings above come from running real tasks through real models and scoring every output. Spring Prompt is that same engine — pointed at your prompt, your test cases, and your definition of good.
- Generate test cases from your prompt — no eval set required to start.
- Compare models side by side with quality, cost and latency in one matrix.
- Optimise the winner until the scores say it's ready to ship.
Experiment · Cold outreach email
Prompt × model results
12 test cases · 3 evalsClaude Opus
GPT-5
Gemini
v1
7.1
6.8
7.4
v2
8.3
7.9
8.0
v3
9.2
★
8.6
8.4
Best combo: v3 × Claude Opus
9.2 quality · $0.004/run · 1.8s