Confirm Action

Are you sure you want to proceed?

Is claude-sonnet-4.5-low good at Structured Output?

claude-sonnet-4.5-low ranks #23 of 43 for Structured Output — strong. The top pick for this task is qwen3.7-max-low.

#23 / 43
Rank for this task
88.1
Score
$0.0236
Cost / run

claude-sonnet-4.5-low on each Structured Output sub-task

Noisy Structured Output Test 91.2/100 #16
Missing & Ambiguous Data 90.0/100 #27
Transformation 90.0/100 #26
Extraction 85.7/100 #21
Schema Adherence 85.7/100 #30

Real examples, graded

WeakSupport ticket to schema 55/100

“The model correctly extracted all data, adhered to the schema types, and properly used null for the missing assignee. However, it completely failed the negative constraint to omit code fences. Because the raw output includes markdown fences, it cannot be parsed directly as JSON, resulting in a hard zero for both schema validity and no wrapper text.”

← Full claude-sonnet-4.5-low review All Structured Output rankings → Top pick: qwen3.7-max-low →

Frequently asked

Is claude-sonnet-4.5-low good at Structured Output?

claude-sonnet-4.5-low ranks #23 of 43 models we tested for Structured Output, scoring strong.

What is claude-sonnet-4.5-low's strongest Structured Output skill?

Its best sub-task here is Noisy Structured Output Test.

This page is Spring Prompt, running

We just did this for every model. Do it for your prompt.

The rankings above come from running real tasks through real models and scoring every output. Spring Prompt is that same engine — pointed at your prompt, your test cases, and your definition of good.

  • Generate test cases from your prompt — no eval set required to start.
  • Compare models side by side with quality, cost and latency in one matrix.
  • Optimise the winner until the scores say it's ready to ship.
Experiment · Cold outreach email

Prompt × model results

12 test cases · 3 evals
Claude Opus
GPT-5
Gemini
v1
7.1
6.8
7.4
v2
8.3
7.9
8.0
v3
9.2
8.6
8.4
Best combo: v3 × Claude Opus
9.2 quality · $0.004/run · 1.8s