Confirm Action

Are you sure you want to proceed?

Is Deepseek v3.1 Terminus good at Translation & Localization?

Deepseek v3.1 Terminus ranks #43 of 44 for Translation & Localization — strong. The top pick for this task is qwen3.7-max.

#43 / 44
Rank for this task
85.1
Score
$0.0151
Cost / run

Deepseek v3.1 Terminus on each Translation & Localization sub-task

Register & Formality 97.0/100 #44
Business Translation 90.0/100 #43
Localization 74.0/100 #40
Catch the Translation Error 71.0/100 #41

Real examples, graded

WeakSupport reply with a false-friend trap (EN→German) 70/100

“The model failed the specific instruction to handle 'embarrassed' carefully. It explicitly rejected the correct natural translations ('peinlich', 'unangenehm') and instead provided a translation that loses the nuance ('tut uns leid') and one that is too dramatic for business register ('schämen uns'). Additionally, the first sentence contains translationese ('Es tut uns leid für').”

WeakJapanese keigo direction (EN→Japanese) 91/100

“The model uses excellent, natural business Japanese with the correct humble keigo (kenjougo) for the company's actions. However, it transcreates the message rather than translating it directly, omitting 'your request' and adding 'we will contact you again'. It also includes unprompted explanatory text.”

← Full Deepseek v3.1 Terminus review All Translation & Localization rankings → Top pick: qwen3.7-max →

Frequently asked

Is Deepseek v3.1 Terminus good at Translation & Localization?

Deepseek v3.1 Terminus ranks #43 of 44 models we tested for Translation & Localization, scoring strong.

What is Deepseek v3.1 Terminus's strongest Translation & Localization skill?

Its best sub-task here is Register & Formality.

This page is Spring Prompt, running

We just did this for every model. Do it for your prompt.

The rankings above come from running real tasks through real models and scoring every output. Spring Prompt is that same engine — pointed at your prompt, your test cases, and your definition of good.

  • Generate test cases from your prompt — no eval set required to start.
  • Compare models side by side with quality, cost and latency in one matrix.
  • Optimise the winner until the scores say it's ready to ship.
Experiment · Cold outreach email

Prompt × model results

12 test cases · 3 evals
Claude Opus
GPT-5
Gemini
v1
7.1
6.8
7.4
v2
8.3
7.9
8.0
v3
9.2
8.6
8.4
Best combo: v3 × Claude Opus
9.2 quality · $0.004/run · 1.8s