Is Deepseek v4 Pro good at Sales?
Deepseek v4 Pro ranks #44 of 110 for Sales — usable. The top pick for this task is Claude Opus 4.8 (max reasoning).
Best result with medium reasoning effort.
Deepseek v4 Pro on each Sales sub-task
| Follow-up & Break-up | 89.7/100 | #4 |
| Cold Outbound Email | 88.5/100 | #17 |
| Discovery Call Prep | 69.3/100 | #57 |
| Objection Handling | 69.2/100 | #85 |
Real examples, graded
WinInsight-led touch to a finance buyer 92/100
“The response perfectly executes the prompt's constraints, delivering a concise (under 110 words), hype-free, and highly relevant follow-up email. It leverages the provided facts without any fabrication and leads with the exact requested insight. The ask is clear, low-friction, and contextually tied to the insight.”
WeakPrice objection, no reflexive discount 16/100
“The model completely failed the task by outputting its internal planning process instead of the requested email or call script, and the text cuts off mid-sentence.”
Frequently asked
Is Deepseek v4 Pro good at Sales?
Deepseek v4 Pro ranks #44 of 110 models we tested for Sales, scoring usable.
What is Deepseek v4 Pro's strongest Sales skill?
Its best sub-task here is Follow-up & Break-up.
This page is Spring Prompt, running in public
We just did this for every model. Do it for your prompt.
The rankings above come from running real tasks through real models and scoring every output. Spring Prompt is that same engine — pointed at your prompt, your test cases, and your definition of good.
- Generate test cases from your prompt — no eval set required to start.
- Compare models side by side with quality, cost and latency in one matrix.
- Optimise the winner until the scores say it's ready to ship.
Prompt × model results
12 test cases · 3 evals