Is gemini-3.1-flash-lite-medium good at Coding?
gemini-3.1-flash-lite-medium ranks #18 of 52 for Coding — strong. The top pick for this task is claude-opus-4.8-medium.
#18 / 52
Rank for this task
82.8
Score
$0.0205
Cost / run
gemini-3.1-flash-lite-medium on each Coding sub-task
| Secure Implementation | 99.5/100 | #14 |
| Code Review & Security | 98.0/100 | #36 |
| Refactoring | 82.7/100 | #19 |
| Code Quality and Testing Test | 82.2/100 | #24 |
| API and Data Code Test | 64.0/100 | #28 |
Real examples, graded
WeakBehavior-preserving refactor 50/100
“The model correctly refactored the nested if statements into a generator expression while preserving the necessary guards, meeting all criteria with no failures.”
Frequently asked
Is gemini-3.1-flash-lite-medium good at Coding?
gemini-3.1-flash-lite-medium ranks #18 of 52 models we tested for Coding, scoring strong.
What is gemini-3.1-flash-lite-medium's strongest Coding skill?
Its best sub-task here is Secure Implementation.
This page is Spring Prompt, running
We just did this for every model. Do it for your prompt.
The rankings above come from running real tasks through real models and scoring every output. Spring Prompt is that same engine — pointed at your prompt, your test cases, and your definition of good.
- Generate test cases from your prompt — no eval set required to start.
- Compare models side by side with quality, cost and latency in one matrix.
- Optimise the winner until the scores say it's ready to ship.
Experiment · Cold outreach email
Prompt × model results
12 test cases · 3 evalsClaude Opus
GPT-5
Gemini
v1
7.1
6.8
7.4
v2
8.3
7.9
8.0
v3
9.2
★
8.6
8.4
Best combo: v3 × Claude Opus
9.2 quality · $0.004/run · 1.8s