Confirm Action

Are you sure you want to proceed?

Is Glm 5 good at Structured Output?

Glm 5 ranks #43 of 43 for Structured Output — usable. The top pick for this task is qwen3.7-max-low.

#43 / 43
Rank for this task
76.5
Score
$0.0257
Cost / run

Glm 5 on each Structured Output sub-task

Noisy Structured Output Test 76.5/100 #38
← Full Glm 5 review All Structured Output rankings → Top pick: qwen3.7-max-low →

Frequently asked

Is Glm 5 good at Structured Output?

Glm 5 ranks #43 of 43 models we tested for Structured Output, scoring usable.

What is Glm 5's strongest Structured Output skill?

Its best sub-task here is Noisy Structured Output Test.

This page is Spring Prompt, running

We just did this for every model. Do it for your prompt.

The rankings above come from running real tasks through real models and scoring every output. Spring Prompt is that same engine — pointed at your prompt, your test cases, and your definition of good.

  • Generate test cases from your prompt — no eval set required to start.
  • Compare models side by side with quality, cost and latency in one matrix.
  • Optimise the winner until the scores say it's ready to ship.
Experiment · Cold outreach email

Prompt × model results

12 test cases · 3 evals
Claude Opus
GPT-5
Gemini
v1
7.1
6.8
7.4
v2
8.3
7.9
8.0
v3
9.2
8.6
8.4
Best combo: v3 × Claude Opus
9.2 quality · $0.004/run · 1.8s