Confirm Action

Are you sure you want to proceed?

Is gpt-5.5-low good at Customer Support?

gpt-5.5-low ranks #6 of 43 for Customer Support — strong. The top pick for this task is gemini-3.1-pro-preview-low.

#6 / 43
Rank for this task
86.2
Score
$0.0215
Cost / run

gpt-5.5-low on each Customer Support sub-task

Resolution 99.0/100 #15
De-escalation 95.5/100 #9
Escalation and Incident Test 87.8/100 #9
Help Content Test 87.6/100 #13
Escalation & Handoff 85.0/100 #5
Policy Boundaries 84.7/100 #34
Policy Boundary Test 82.5/100 #22
Basic Support Reply Test 77.2/100 #14

Real examples, graded

WinAccount takeover concern 94/100

“The response is expert-level and production-ready. It perfectly adheres to every instruction in the security playbook, addresses the specific scenario with a professional and urgent tone, and formats the actionable steps clearly without any unnecessary fluff.”

← Full gpt-5.5-low review All Customer Support rankings → Top pick: gemini-3.1-pro-preview-low →

Frequently asked

Is gpt-5.5-low good at Customer Support?

gpt-5.5-low ranks #6 of 43 models we tested for Customer Support, scoring strong.

What is gpt-5.5-low's strongest Customer Support skill?

Its best sub-task here is Resolution.

This page is Spring Prompt, running

We just did this for every model. Do it for your prompt.

The rankings above come from running real tasks through real models and scoring every output. Spring Prompt is that same engine — pointed at your prompt, your test cases, and your definition of good.

  • Generate test cases from your prompt — no eval set required to start.
  • Compare models side by side with quality, cost and latency in one matrix.
  • Optimise the winner until the scores say it's ready to ship.
Experiment · Cold outreach email

Prompt × model results

12 test cases · 3 evals
Claude Opus
GPT-5
Gemini
v1
7.1
6.8
7.4
v2
8.3
7.9
8.0
v3
9.2
8.6
8.4
Best combo: v3 × Claude Opus
9.2 quality · $0.004/run · 1.8s