Confirm Action

Are you sure you want to proceed?

OpenAI · frontier

Is GPT-5.5 good?

GPT-5.5 places top-3 in 8 of 22 task areas we tested. It's strongest at content & brand and weakest at training & education. It's a top-tier (premium) option ($35/1M tokens).

Top-3 finishes
22/22
Task areas tested
$35.0
Per 1M tokens
Slow
Typical speed

Our take

OpenAI: GPT-5.5 is a frontier-tier model that we tested across 22 task areas. It performs best at Coding, and is weakest at Data & Analytics.

Strengths

Clarity Usefulness Concision Specificity Structure Grounding no fabrication

Weak spots

Visual design Listening design Appropriate caveats

How GPT-5.5 ranks, task by task

Rank is the position in each field; Rating is the absolute quality bar. A model can be rated "Excellent" yet sit mid-table when the whole field is strong — and vice-versa.

Task area Rank
Coding #2 of 52
Content & Brand #2 of 50
Presentations & Decks #2 of 44
Structured Output #2 of 43
Chef / Home Cooking #3 of 50
Knowledge & Docs #5 of 94
Product & Project Management #3 of 44
Research & Competitive Analysis #3 of 44
Translation & Localization #3 of 44
Landing Pages #4 of 56
Executive Assistant #4 of 50
Frontend & Landing Pages #9 of 93
RAG, Safety & Grounding #4 of 35
Customer Support #6 of 43
Investor & Pitch #7 of 50
Summarization & Meeting Notes #7 of 44
Legal & HR #10 of 44
Data & Analytics #23 of 69
AI Strategy #22 of 50
Creative & Comedy #21 of 44
Sales #22 of 44
Training & Education #27 of 44

Industry benchmarks

Standardized third-party scores, shown for context — these are independent of our real-task tests.

Artificial Analysis indices

54.8
Intelligence
74.9
Coding
44.9
Agentic

Design Arena — human preference (avg Elo 1300)

3d 1260 svg 1283 dataviz 1302 gamedev 1350 website 1291 asciiart 1318 uicomponent 1300 codecategories 1297

Headline vs. real-world

GPT-5.5's real-world results broadly track its headline Intelligence Index.

Source: Artificial Analysis (artificialanalysis.ai) via OpenRouter (openrouter.ai/rankings). (2026-06-29) · Source: Design Arena (www.designarena.ai) via OpenRouter (openrouter.ai/rankings). (2026-06-29)

Like GPT-5.5, but…

Similar

Cheaper

Smarter

No clear alternative.

Frequently asked

Is GPT-5.5 any good?

GPT-5.5 places top-3 in 8 of 22 task areas we benchmarked. It performs best at Content & Brand.

What is GPT-5.5 best at?

Its strongest task areas are Content & Brand, Coding, Presentations & Decks.

Is there a cheaper alternative to GPT-5.5?

Qwen3.7 Max is 86% cheaper and stays competitive on quality across our benchmarks.

How we test & rank

Each model is scored on real tasks across 22 task areas by an LLM judge with deterministic checks. "Percentile" is this model's standing within each area's field; the cross-area figures are rank-based so quality and Elo scores are never mixed.

This page is Spring Prompt, running

We just did this for every model. Do it for your prompt.

The rankings above come from running real tasks through real models and scoring every output. Spring Prompt is that same engine — pointed at your prompt, your test cases, and your definition of good.

  • Generate test cases from your prompt — no eval set required to start.
  • Compare models side by side with quality, cost and latency in one matrix.
  • Optimise the winner until the scores say it's ready to ship.
Experiment · Cold outreach email

Prompt × model results

12 test cases · 3 evals
Claude Opus
GPT-5
Gemini
v1
7.1
6.8
7.4
v2
8.3
7.9
8.0
v3
9.2
8.6
8.4
Best combo: v3 × Claude Opus
9.2 quality · $0.004/run · 1.8s