Is Grok 4.20 Beta good at Customer Support?
Grok 4.20 Beta ranks #23 of 43 for Customer Support — usable. The top pick for this task is gemini-3.1-pro-preview-low.
Grok 4.20 Beta on each Customer Support sub-task
| Policy Boundaries | 94.0/100 | #20 |
| Help Content Test | 83.4/100 | #22 |
| Escalation and Incident Test | 83.2/100 | #23 |
| Resolution | 77.5/100 | #27 |
| Escalation & Handoff | 73.5/100 | #14 |
| Policy Boundary Test | 72.0/100 | #29 |
| Basic Support Reply Test | 69.8/100 | #25 |
| De-escalation | 63.0/100 | #27 |
Real examples, graded
WinChurn rescue 95/100
“The response is excellent and production-ready. It perfectly adheres to the constraints (offering the exact three recovery options and no discount), takes ownership of the issue with a highly empathetic tone, and provides a clear, concise path forward. The only minor area for improvement would be acknowledging the 14 invited seats to add a touch more personalization, but the response is otherwise flawless.”
WeakTone rewrite 73/100
“The model successfully adhered to the policy and included the required alternatives, but failed to significantly improve the robotic tone, retaining the exact phrase 'Per policy, refunds are unavailable after 30 days' from the original input.”
Frequently asked
Is Grok 4.20 Beta good at Customer Support?
Grok 4.20 Beta ranks #23 of 43 models we tested for Customer Support, scoring usable.
What is Grok 4.20 Beta's strongest Customer Support skill?
Its best sub-task here is Policy Boundaries.
This page is Spring Prompt, running
We just did this for every model. Do it for your prompt.
The rankings above come from running real tasks through real models and scoring every output. Spring Prompt is that same engine — pointed at your prompt, your test cases, and your definition of good.
- Generate test cases from your prompt — no eval set required to start.
- Compare models side by side with quality, cost and latency in one matrix.
- Optimise the winner until the scores say it's ready to ship.
Prompt × model results
12 test cases · 3 evals