Confirm Action

Are you sure you want to proceed?

xAI · mid

Is Grok 4.20 Beta good?

Grok 4.20 Beta has been tested across 22 task areas. It's strongest at frontend & landing pages and weakest at creative & comedy. It's a mid-priced option ($8/1M tokens).

Top-3 finishes
22/22
Task areas tested
$8.0
Per 1M tokens
Slow
Typical speed

Our take

xAI: Grok 4.20 Beta is a mid-tier model that we tested across 22 task areas. It performs best at Frontend & Landing Pages, and is weakest at Creative & Comedy.

Strengths

Clarity Concision Specificity Structure Tone Prioritisation

Weak spots

Constraint adherence Appropriate caveats Visual design Food quality Practical sequencing Grounding attribution

How Grok 4.20 Beta ranks, task by task

Rank is the position in each field; Rating is the absolute quality bar. A model can be rated "Excellent" yet sit mid-table when the whole field is strong — and vice-versa.

Task area Rank
Frontend & Landing Pages #21 of 93
Chef / Home Cooking #17 of 50
Product & Project Management #18 of 44
Structured Output #18 of 43
AI Strategy #25 of 50
Investor & Pitch #25 of 50
Customer Support #23 of 43
Data & Analytics #42 of 69
Presentations & Decks #29 of 44
Sales #29 of 44
Knowledge & Docs #71 of 94
Content & Brand #41 of 50
Coding #43 of 52
Landing Pages #47 of 56
Summarization & Meeting Notes #37 of 44
Executive Assistant #43 of 50
Research & Competitive Analysis #38 of 44
Translation & Localization #38 of 44
Training & Education #41 of 44
RAG, Safety & Grounding #33 of 35
Creative & Comedy #44 of 44
Legal & HR #44 of 44

Industry benchmarks

Standardized third-party scores, shown for context — these are independent of our real-task tests.

Design Arena — human preference (avg Elo 1217)

3d 1227 svg 1111 dataviz 1244 gamedev 1235 website 1256 asciiart 1171 uicomponent 1245 codecategories 1249

Headline vs. real-world

Source: Artificial Analysis (artificialanalysis.ai) via OpenRouter (openrouter.ai/rankings). (2026-06-29) · Source: Design Arena (www.designarena.ai) via OpenRouter (openrouter.ai/rankings). (2026-06-29)

Like Grok 4.20 Beta, but…

Cheaper

Smarter

Frequently asked

Is Grok 4.20 Beta any good?

Grok 4.20 Beta places top-3 in 0 of 22 task areas we benchmarked. It performs best at Frontend & Landing Pages.

What is Grok 4.20 Beta best at?

Its strongest task areas are Frontend & Landing Pages, Chef / Home Cooking, Product & Project Management.

Is there a cheaper alternative to Grok 4.20 Beta?

DeepSeek V3.2 is 93% cheaper and stays competitive on quality across our benchmarks.

How we test & rank

Each model is scored on real tasks across 22 task areas by an LLM judge with deterministic checks. "Percentile" is this model's standing within each area's field; the cross-area figures are rank-based so quality and Elo scores are never mixed.

This page is Spring Prompt, running

We just did this for every model. Do it for your prompt.

The rankings above come from running real tasks through real models and scoring every output. Spring Prompt is that same engine — pointed at your prompt, your test cases, and your definition of good.

  • Generate test cases from your prompt — no eval set required to start.
  • Compare models side by side with quality, cost and latency in one matrix.
  • Optimise the winner until the scores say it's ready to ship.
Experiment · Cold outreach email

Prompt × model results

12 test cases · 3 evals
Claude Opus
GPT-5
Gemini
v1
7.1
6.8
7.4
v2
8.3
7.9
8.0
v3
9.2
8.6
8.4
Best combo: v3 × Claude Opus
9.2 quality · $0.004/run · 1.8s