Confirm Action

Are you sure you want to proceed?

Is grok-4.20-medium good at Coding?

grok-4.20-medium ranks #33 of 52 for Coding — usable. The top pick for this task is claude-opus-4.8-medium.

#33 / 52
Rank for this task
78.2
Score
$0.0201
Cost / run

grok-4.20-medium on each Coding sub-task

Code Review & Security 97.0/100 #37
Secure Implementation 84.8/100 #28
Code Quality and Testing Test 79.4/100 #32
Refactoring 76.3/100 #39
API and Data Code Test 65.4/100 #26

Real examples, graded

WinTypeScript type narrowing 100/100

“The model provides a flawless, production-ready solution. It correctly uses idiomatic TypeScript discriminated union narrowing to handle the null and bank cases without using `any`. The explanation is concise, accurate, and directly addresses the prompt's requirements.”

← Full grok-4.20-medium review All Coding rankings → Top pick: claude-opus-4.8-medium →

Frequently asked

Is grok-4.20-medium good at Coding?

grok-4.20-medium ranks #33 of 52 models we tested for Coding, scoring usable.

What is grok-4.20-medium's strongest Coding skill?

Its best sub-task here is Code Review & Security.

This page is Spring Prompt, running

We just did this for every model. Do it for your prompt.

The rankings above come from running real tasks through real models and scoring every output. Spring Prompt is that same engine — pointed at your prompt, your test cases, and your definition of good.

  • Generate test cases from your prompt — no eval set required to start.
  • Compare models side by side with quality, cost and latency in one matrix.
  • Optimise the winner until the scores say it's ready to ship.
Experiment · Cold outreach email

Prompt × model results

12 test cases · 3 evals
Claude Opus
GPT-5
Gemini
v1
7.1
6.8
7.4
v2
8.3
7.9
8.0
v3
9.2
8.6
8.4
Best combo: v3 × Claude Opus
9.2 quality · $0.004/run · 1.8s