Confirm Action

Are you sure you want to proceed?

xAI · mid

Is Grok 4.20 good?

Grok 4.20 has been tested across 21 task areas. It's strongest at frontend & landing pages and weakest at content & brand. It's a mid-priced option ($3.75/1M tokens).

Top-3 finishes
21/22
Task areas tested
$3.75
Per 1M tokens
Slow
Typical speed

Our take

xAI: Grok 4.20 is a mid-tier model that we tested across 21 task areas. It performs best at Frontend & Landing Pages, and is weakest at Content & Brand.

Strengths

Clarity Tone Prioritisation Coverage Risk detection Code quality

Weak spots

Appropriate caveats Practical sequencing Food quality Timing accuracy Originality Visual design

How Grok 4.20 ranks, task by task

Rank is the position in each field; Rating is the absolute quality bar. A model can be rated "Excellent" yet sit mid-table when the whole field is strong — and vice-versa.

Task area Rank
Frontend & Landing Pages #11 of 93
Landing Pages #12 of 56
AI Strategy #11 of 50
Presentations & Decks #14 of 44
Research & Competitive Analysis #24 of 44
Knowledge & Docs #57 of 94
Coding #33 of 52
Creative & Comedy #31 of 44
Executive Assistant #36 of 50
Data & Analytics #51 of 69
Investor & Pitch #39 of 50
Sales #35 of 44
Chef / Home Cooking #41 of 50
Product & Project Management #37 of 44
Training & Education #37 of 44
Summarization & Meeting Notes #40 of 44
Customer Support #40 of 43
Structured Output #40 of 43
Translation & Localization #41 of 44
Legal & HR #43 of 44
Content & Brand #50 of 50

Industry benchmarks

Standardized third-party scores, shown for context — these are independent of our real-task tests.

Headline vs. real-world

Source: Artificial Analysis (artificialanalysis.ai) via OpenRouter (openrouter.ai/rankings). (2026-06-29) · Source: Design Arena (www.designarena.ai) via OpenRouter (openrouter.ai/rankings). (2026-06-29)

Like Grok 4.20, but…

Cheaper

Smarter

Frequently asked

Is Grok 4.20 any good?

Grok 4.20 places top-3 in 0 of 21 task areas we benchmarked. It performs best at Frontend & Landing Pages.

What is Grok 4.20 best at?

Its strongest task areas are Frontend & Landing Pages, Landing Pages, AI Strategy.

Is there a cheaper alternative to Grok 4.20?

DeepSeek V3.2 is 85% cheaper and stays competitive on quality across our benchmarks.

How we test & rank

Each model is scored on real tasks across 21 task areas by an LLM judge with deterministic checks. "Percentile" is this model's standing within each area's field; the cross-area figures are rank-based so quality and Elo scores are never mixed.

This page is Spring Prompt, running

We just did this for every model. Do it for your prompt.

The rankings above come from running real tasks through real models and scoring every output. Spring Prompt is that same engine — pointed at your prompt, your test cases, and your definition of good.

  • Generate test cases from your prompt — no eval set required to start.
  • Compare models side by side with quality, cost and latency in one matrix.
  • Optimise the winner until the scores say it's ready to ship.
Experiment · Cold outreach email

Prompt × model results

12 test cases · 3 evals
Claude Opus
GPT-5
Gemini
v1
7.1
6.8
7.4
v2
8.3
7.9
8.0
v3
9.2
8.6
8.4
Best combo: v3 × Claude Opus
9.2 quality · $0.004/run · 1.8s